Skip to content

Northern Kentucky

In progress. College basketball is still being built and is not in the navigation. The ratings are ours and are shown with the date they were fitted; they are not graded in public.

Horizon · 18-12 · AdjEM +0.1, 172 of 359 nationally.

2021-22 seasonthrough ratings as of 2022-04-0421 weekly snapshots

Adjusted ratingas of 2022-04-04

Every team →
AdjEM
+0.1172 of 359
AdjO
100.6183 of 359
AdjD
100.5166 of 359
AdjT
67.0314 of 359

Northern Kentucky went from -4.0 (#291) on 2021-11-15 to +0.1 (#172) on 2022-04-04, peaking at +0.4 (#163) on 2022-03-07.

AdjEM in each weekly snapshot this season; the dashed line is an average D1 team (0).

2021-11-152022-04-04

Four factorsraw season rates · 30 complete games

Leaderboards →
eFG%
49.5%200
TOV%
18.3%247
OREB%
35.2%7
FTA/FGA
26.6%281
Opp eFG%
49.5%152
Opp TOV%
19.7%40
DREB%
71.3%274
Opp FTA/FGA
25.0%47

Résumé18-12 · against the ratings of 2022-04-04

Schedule strength
-5.0325 of 359
Non-conference
-1.9271 of 359
Luck
-1.9%211 of 359
Wins above bubble
-7.0180 of 359
Quad 1
0-1
Quad 2
0-1
Quad 3
4-4
Quad 4
14-6

Quadrants use the selection committee's boundaries (Quad 1 is a home game against the top 30, a neutral one against the top 50, or a road game against the top 75) applied to our ranking, not to the NCAA's NET, so they will not match a NET team sheet game for game. Luck and wins above bubble compare the record with today's ratings; they are not a record of our projections.

Players15 who played · most minutes first

National leaders →
PlayerGMPGPPGRPGAPGeFG%TS%USG%3P%FT%
Sam VinsonG3232.811.24.33.447.6%50.5%21.2%35.2%67.7%
Marques WarrickG3231.316.82.92.349.4%53.3%29.2%35.3%81.8%
Trevon FaulknerG3129.611.83.51.548.8%53.0%22.2%37.3%78.7%
Bryson LangdonG3227.66.32.03.947.0%49.8%15.5%25.0%69.6%
Chris BrandonF3220.15.17.40.363.2%64.2%13.0%—65.9%
Adrian NelsonF3020.56.97.40.458.4%59.1%16.9%0.0%60.9%
Trey RobinsonG3117.54.03.20.745.8%47.2%15.8%28.3%58.3%
Hubertas PivoriusG259.65.00.40.264.4%65.0%23.9%44.3%83.3%
Jake EvansG307.61.60.70.646.6%49.7%14.5%23.8%77.8%
David BohmF2011.13.52.30.841.0%41.6%23.3%32.0%46.2%
Seybian SimsF137.01.61.10.140.9%43.9%16.5%33.3%75.0%
Isaiah MasonG104.40.80.70.240.0%36.5%15.3%0.0%0.0%
Darius HardingG121.011.06.00.043.8%55.6%27.0%20.0%100.0%
Noah HupmannC81.80.30.40.0100.0%100.0%11.1%——
David WasslerF32.02.00.00.075.0%75.0%43.3%50.0%—

Season totals for every game played, from ESPN's statistics feed. In seasons before 2025-26 a roster can be missing a player or hold one who was elsewhere; usage is blank where the players listed do not add up to the team's minutes.

Games18-12

“Ours” is our projected margin for Northern Kentucky, from the snapshot dated before each game. Games before the season's first snapshot have none.

DateOpponentQuadResultOurs
11-12vsUNC GreensboroQ4#177L 69-70—
11-18vsEastern MichiganQ4#316W 74-73+9.6
11-22vsWestern IllinoisQ4#233L 67-69+7.6
11-26@DePaulQ2#118L 68-77-13.7
12-02@Cleveland StateQ3#164L 58-72-7.6
12-04@Purdue Fort WayneQ3#236L 57-71-7.9
12-08vsCanisiusQ4#261W 75-62+8.0
12-18@Eastern KentuckyQ4#255L 68-81-10.7
12-22@IndianaQ1#55L 61-79-17.0
12-30vsGreen BayQ4#342W 79-74+9.1
01-01vsMilwaukeeQ4#329L 55-61+9.5
01-13@Youngstown StateQ3#228W 68-67-8.7
01-15@Robert MorrisQ4#312L 64-74-3.2
01-20@UICQ4#270W 74-70-6.2
01-22@IU IndianapolisQ4#359W 60-41+5.6
01-25vsWright StateQ4#171W 73-63+2.1
01-28vsPurdue Fort WayneQ4#236W 59-49+3.6
01-30vsCleveland StateQ4#164W 78-72+0.5
02-04vsOaklandQ3#149W 87-78-3.2
02-05vsDetroit MercyQ4#220L 68-74+1.7
02-09@MilwaukeeQ4#329W 75-39+0.3
02-11@Green BayQ4#342W 71-62+2.4
02-13@Wright StateQ3#171W 75-71-6.2
02-18@Detroit MercyQ3#220L 52-60-2.6
02-20@OaklandQ3#149W 71-66-7.6
02-24vsRobert MorrisQ4#312W 78-64+10.0
02-26vsYoungstown StateQ4#228W 75-61+4.4
03-03vsDetroit MercyQ4#220W 77-59+4.3
03-07nPurdue Fort WayneQ4#236W 57-43+1.8
03-08nWright StateQ3#171L 71-72+0.4

How this is measured

Ranks are out of 359 rated teams, 1 = best (for AdjD and the defensive factors, 1 = allowed the least). The four factors are raw season rates from box scores.

Every projection uses a rating snapshot dated before the game — the snapshot column shows which. A snapshot dated on or after a game already contains its result, so it is never used to project it; a game before the season's first snapshot gets no number at all. Projected margin is (this team's AdjEM − the opponent's ± home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100.