Army

In progress. College basketball is still being built and is not in the navigation. The ratings are ours and are shown with the date they were fitted; they are not graded in public.

Patriot · 15-16 · AdjEM -14.3, 319 of 364 nationally.

2024-25 seasonthrough ratings as of 2025-04-0724 weekly snapshots

Adjusted ratingas of 2025-04-07

Every team →

AdjEM: -14.3319 of 364
AdjO: 97.7300 of 364
AdjD: 112.0313 of 364
AdjT: 71.290 of 364

Army went from -16.1 (#332) on 2024-11-03 to -14.3 (#319) on 2025-04-07, peaking at -11.9 (#298) on 2025-02-17.

AdjEM in each weekly snapshot this season; the dashed line is an average D1 team (0).

2024-11-032025-04-07

Four factorsraw season rates · 31 complete games

Leaderboards →

eFG%: 49.5%250
TOV%: 13.3%21
OREB%: 23.8%296
FTA/FGA: 26.1%341
Opp eFG%: 53.7%307
Opp TOV%: 15.0%256
DREB%: 71.9%210
Opp FTA/FGA: 27.4%45

Résumé15-16 · against the ratings of 2025-04-07

Schedule strength: -6.7304 of 364
Non-conference: -2.6268 of 364
Luck: +14.3%2 of 364
Wins above bubble: -13.3243 of 364

Quad 1: 0-1
Quad 2: 0-0
Quad 3: 0-7
Quad 4: 15-8

Quadrants use the selection committee's boundaries (Quad 1 is a home game against the top 30, a neutral one against the top 50, or a road game against the top 75) applied to our ranking, not to the NCAA's NET, so they will not match a NET team sheet game for game. Luck and wins above bubble compare the record with today's ratings; they are not a record of our projections.

Players24 who played · most minutes first

National leaders →

Player	G	MPG	PPG	RPG	APG	eFG%	TS%	USG%	3P%	FT%
Ryan CurryG	33	33.6	12.5	4.4	3.6	54.5%	55.7%	19.7%	37.2%	75.0%
Jalen RuckerG	32	33.7	18.3	4.2	3.2	48.7%	52.2%	30.4%	32.5%	81.1%
Josh ScovensG	29	31.7	15.2	4.2	1.8	48.9%	52.4%	25.7%	27.8%	66.4%
AJ AllenspachF	33	25.8	10.7	7.0	1.3	68.2%	68.5%	18.7%	100.0%	66.4%
Blake BarkerG	33	20.8	3.7	2.9	1.1	40.5%	43.8%	11.6%	27.2%	71.4%
Isaiah CaldwellG	30	20.0	2.6	2.6	0.8	35.9%	37.6%	10.6%	18.9%	52.6%
Jacen HollowayF	33	9.6	2.6	1.2	0.5	46.7%	48.7%	16.6%	20.8%	57.7%
Kendall HaileyG	33	9.0	0.7	1.2	0.7	32.8%	34.5%	8.9%	29.4%	50.0%
Jorn EversonF	32	9.3	4.6	1.1	0.6	54.7%	54.6%	27.3%	30.3%	50.0%
Kevin McCarthyG	29	8.0	2.3	1.2	0.4	55.7%	55.7%	15.2%	37.0%	—
Tate LaczkowskiF	23	8.8	2.4	2.6	0.6	46.4%	46.5%	18.3%	34.8%	44.4%
Blane St. ClairG	8	3.8	0.3	0.4	0.0	12.5%	12.5%	13.8%	0.0%	—
Jackson MayoG	10	2.9	1.2	0.6	0.2	40.0%	40.0%	26.8%	26.7%	—
JT DoughertyF	8	3.3	1.3	0.9	0.1	50.0%	55.9%	17.9%	40.0%	100.0%
Luke BensonG	6	3.5	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0%	0.0%	12.3%	0.0%	—
Chanse PerkinsF	6	2.3	0.5	0.3	0.3	0.0%	20.5%	30.8%	0.0%	42.9%
Dayon PolkG	6	2.0	0.5	0.2	0.3	75.0%	60.6%	10.7%	50.0%	0.0%
Dylan MuransF	3	2.3	0.7	0.3	0.0	25.0%	25.0%	29.6%	0.0%	—
Nnaemeka IkechiF	3	2.3	0.7	1.0	0.0	100.0%	100.0%	14.8%	—	—
Joshua EliF	2	2.5	2.0	1.0	0.0	50.0%	67.8%	30.6%	0.0%	100.0%
Jaxson BellG	3	1.3	1.0	0.7	0.0	75.0%	75.0%	38.9%	100.0%	—
Brendon O'KeefeG	1	2.0	2.0	0.0	0.0	100.0%	100.0%	25.9%	—	—
Alex EngroG	2	1.0	1.0	0.5	0.5	—	52.6%	75.2%	—	50.0%
Griff LambF	2	0.5	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0%	0.0%	51.9%	—	—

Season totals for every game played, from ESPN's statistics feed. In seasons before 2025-26 a roster can be missing a player or hold one who was elsewhere; usage is blank where the players listed do not add up to the team's minutes.

Games15-16

“Ours” is our projected margin for Army, from the snapshot dated before each game. Games before the season's first snapshot have none.

Date	Opponent	Quad	Result	Ours	Pace	Snapshot
11-04	vsUAlbany	Q4#265	W 67-59	-2.8	71	11-03
11-08	@Duke	Q1#1	L 58-100	-30.4	69	11-04
11-15	@Marist	Q4#247	L 88-91	-10.1	68	11-11
11-20	vsFairleigh Dickinson	Q4#306	W 84-70	+5.7	71	11-18
11-22	@Manhattan	Q4#262	L 79-80	-1.3	70	11-18
12-03	@Le Moyne	Q4#351	W 103-100	-1.7	70	12-02
12-08	vsCornell	Q3#104	L 84-103	-7.3	71	12-02
12-13	@George Washington	Q3#147	L 60-75	-11.7	73	12-09
12-22	vsBinghamton	Q4#300	L 68-78	+2.5	70	12-16
12-29	vsUTSA	Q4#198	W 78-75	-1.9	73	12-23
01-02	@Colgate	Q3#223	L 59-71	-9.9	70	12-30
01-05	@Boston University	Q4#294	L 63-71	-8.2	70	12-30
01-08	vsLoyola Maryland	Q4#313	W 74-72	+1.8	71	01-06
01-11	@Lehigh	Q4#275	W 74-69	-7.3	72	01-06
01-15	vsLafayette	Q4#277	W 70-68	-0.4	71	01-13
01-18	vsBoston University	Q4#294	W 68-62	+1.5	70	01-13
01-22	@Holy Cross	Q4#320	W 76-71	-2.3	69	01-20
01-26	vsNavy	Q4#270	L 53-66	+2.8	71	01-20
01-29	vsColgate	Q4#223	W 84-72	-4.8	70	01-27
02-01	@American University	Q3#236	L 68-71	-8.0	69	01-27
02-05	vsHoly Cross	Q4#320	W 68-65	+5.0	69	02-03
02-08	vsBucknell	Q4#201	W 116-110	-0.8	72	02-03
02-12	@Loyola Maryland	Q4#313	W 64-60	-2.0	70	02-10
02-15	@Navy	Q4#270	L 54-61	-3.5	70	02-10
02-19	vsAmerican University	Q4#236	W 76-69	-0.8	68	02-17
02-23	@Bucknell	Q3#201	L 53-84	-8.4	72	02-17
02-25	@Lafayette	Q4#277	L 65-81	-4.5	70	02-24
03-01	vsLehigh	Q4#275	L 67-89	+1.6	71	02-24
03-06	@Colgate	Q3#223	L 55-84	-9.0	70	03-03
03-23	nElon	Q4#204	W 83-78	-8.0	69	03-17
03-24	nFlorida Gulf Coast	Q3#183	L 65-68	-9.3	69	03-17

How this is measured

Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best (for AdjD and the defensive factors, 1 = allowed the least). The four factors are raw season rates from box scores.

Every projection uses a rating snapshot dated before the game — the snapshot column shows which. A snapshot dated on or after a game already contains its result, so it is never used to project it; a game before the season's first snapshot gets no number at all. Projected margin is (this team's AdjEM − the opponent's ± home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100.