Skip to content

Central Michigan

In progress. College basketball is still being built and is not in the navigation. The ratings are ours and are shown with the date they were fitted; they are not graded in public.

MAC · 7-23 · AdjEM -12.9, 332 of 359 nationally.

2021-22 seasonthrough ratings as of 2022-04-0421 weekly snapshots

Adjusted ratingas of 2022-04-04

Every team →
AdjEM
-12.9332 of 359
AdjO
94.2316 of 359
AdjD
107.0314 of 359
AdjT
69.7173 of 359

Central Michigan went from -3.1 (#277) on 2021-11-15 to -12.9 (#332) on 2022-04-04, peaking at -3.1 (#277) on 2021-11-15.

AdjEM in each weekly snapshot this season; the dashed line is an average D1 team (0).

2021-11-152022-04-04

Four factorsraw season rates · 30 complete games

Leaderboards →
eFG%
47.8%273
TOV%
18.4%253
OREB%
22.9%284
FTA/FGA
30.5%166
Opp eFG%
53.0%303
Opp TOV%
15.9%266
DREB%
69.8%323
Opp FTA/FGA
36.0%303

Résumé7-23 · against the ratings of 2022-04-04

Schedule strength
-0.5182 of 359
Non-conference
+2.0126 of 359
Luck
-0.9%186 of 359
Wins above bubble
-14.9321 of 359
Quad 1
0-4
Quad 2
1-5
Quad 3
0-8
Quad 4
6-6

Quadrants use the selection committee's boundaries (Quad 1 is a home game against the top 30, a neutral one against the top 50, or a road game against the top 75) applied to our ranking, not to the NCAA's NET, so they will not match a NET team sheet game for game. Luck and wins above bubble compare the record with today's ratings; they are not a record of our projections.

Players15 who played · most minutes first

National leaders →
PlayerGMPGPPGRPGAPGeFG%TS%USG%3P%FT%
Boopie MillerG3032.913.13.44.646.8%50.9%24.6%36.0%77.9%
Brian TaylorG2932.28.25.81.054.1%57.3%13.8%33.3%75.9%
Ralph BissaintheF2731.39.56.41.147.4%50.0%19.0%34.4%60.0%
Cameron HealyG2830.011.72.41.454.9%56.8%20.3%36.5%76.1%
Harrison HendersonF3023.211.14.80.845.2%50.3%28.3%34.4%69.8%
Jack WebbG2912.20.41.30.319.2%22.5%5.7%14.3%50.0%
Jermaine Jackson Jr.G1127.211.42.32.747.3%50.8%25.6%37.3%85.7%
Oscar Lopez Jr.G1224.910.04.21.749.0%53.7%23.3%38.5%78.8%
Nicolas PavretteF258.71.42.00.238.1%37.5%13.7%—28.6%
Miroslav StaflC1711.63.61.60.341.1%43.1%24.6%23.1%52.4%
Aundre PolkF1210.03.31.90.351.4%49.1%22.3%—33.3%
Dylan JergensG214.30.80.20.226.9%28.7%20.1%0.0%50.0%
Ryan WadeG108.50.30.60.321.4%20.1%4.6%14.3%0.0%
Caleb HodgsonF173.60.90.70.257.1%55.3%18.2%25.0%0.0%
Rastislav SipkovskyF11.00.00.00.0——0.0%——

Season totals for every game played, from ESPN's statistics feed. In seasons before 2025-26 a roster can be missing a player or hold one who was elsewhere; usage is blank where the players listed do not add up to the team's minutes.

Games7-23

“Ours” is our projected margin for Central Michigan, from the snapshot dated before each game. Games before the season's first snapshot have none.

DateOpponentQuadResultOurs
11-09@MissouriQ3#182L 68-78—
11-13@DePaulQ2#118L 66-99—
11-15@Eastern IllinoisQ4#358W 62-61—
11-22nGonzagaQ1#1L 54-107-6.5
11-23nBellarmineQ3#189L 69-76-2.4
11-29@KentuckyQ1#8L 57-85-22.6
12-01@XavierQ1#53L 45-78-20.0
12-05vsWestern IllinoisQ4#233L 70-97-1.9
12-08@Youngstown StateQ3#228L 77-84-19.7
12-11vsUICQ4#270L 67-71-0.4
12-19@Detroit MercyQ3#220L 75-89-15.9
12-29@Kent StateQ2#134W 72-69-15.4
01-04vsToledoQ2#75L 54-82-5.8
01-11@Eastern MichiganQ4#316L 68-99-12.0
01-25vsAkronQ3#121L 56-60-5.8
01-29@Northern IllinoisQ4#313W 69-63-8.3
02-01vsBowling GreenQ4#293W 78-74-2.4
02-03vsWestern MichiganQ4#335W 65-55+5.0
02-05vsBuffaloQ3#110L 54-74-7.2
02-08@Ball StateQ4#267W 89-85-10.3
02-10vsOhioQ3#111L 72-81-10.6
02-12@Western MichiganQ4#335L 63-77-2.2
02-15vsEastern MichiganQ4#316L 70-75-0.2
02-19@ToledoQ1#75L 66-68-20.9
02-22@OhioQ2#111L 50-76-17.4
02-24@Miami (OH)Q4#257W 83-69-9.3
02-26vsKent StateQ3#134L 71-73-8.5
03-01vsMiami (OH)Q4#257L 61-75-0.8
03-04@AkronQ2#121L 56-57-13.2
03-10nToledoQ2#75L 71-72-16.9

How this is measured

Ranks are out of 359 rated teams, 1 = best (for AdjD and the defensive factors, 1 = allowed the least). The four factors are raw season rates from box scores.

Every projection uses a rating snapshot dated before the game — the snapshot column shows which. A snapshot dated on or after a game already contains its result, so it is never used to project it; a game before the season's first snapshot gets no number at all. Projected margin is (this team's AdjEM − the opponent's ± home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100.