Skip to content
Zak Wallace

#21Zak Wallace

Zak Wallace is a Explosive Back for Arkansas State. Zak's 2024 season ranks in the 3th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 164 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Zak Wallace's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Rushing
721 Rush yards11 Rush TD154 Carries4.7 Yards/carry
Receiving
14 Receptions96 Rec yards0 Rec TD6.9 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency3
  • Volume51
  • Explosiveness34
  • Consistency49
  • Receiving30
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)3th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency49th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.44 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.65 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs UL Monroe (SP+ -17).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6500.65Wk 1 vs Central Arkansas: +0.04 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Tulsa: +0.16 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Michigan: -0.35 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Iowa State: -0.01 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs South Alabama: -0.14 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Texas State: +0.09 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Southern Miss: +0.13 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Troy: +0.35 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Louisiana: +0.62 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Georgia State: +0.27 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs UL Monroe: +0.65 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Old Dominion: +0.13 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsCentral ArkansasW34-3115412.721100.04
2vsTulsaW28-24-20.616784.900.16
3@MichiganL18-2810.6351.70160-0.35
4@Iowa StateL7-5210.36101.70-0.01
6vsSouth AlabamaW18-162.811302.704230-0.14
7@Texas StateL9-415.46152.500.09
8@Southern MissW44-28-25.614473.4021000.13
9vsTroyW34-31-6.616644.0324600.35
11@LouisianaL19-554.855110.2131100.62
12@Georgia StateW27-20-17.914624.420.27
13vsUL MonroeW28-21-16.7181307.211-100.65
14vsOld DominionL32-40-6.015895.910.13
20vsBowling GreenW38-31-1.815996.61

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
18.0%
Passing plays
3.0%
Rushing plays
33.9%
Standard downs
22.3%
Passing downs
8.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.22
Passing downs
0.26
Pass / Rush EPA
0.06 / 0.24

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.