Skip to content
Sean Tyler

#2Sean Tyler

RB·Western Michigan·20212.8 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Sean Tyler is a Explosive Back for Western Michigan. Sean's 2021 season ranks in the 45th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 187 plays — a average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Sean Tyler's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2021 Production

Rushing
1150 Rush yards9 Rush TD178 Carries6.5 Yards/carry
Receiving
14 Receptions114 Rec yards2 Rec TD8.1 Yards/rec
Returns
11 Kick returns322 KR yards2 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2021 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency45
  • Volume58
  • Explosiveness70
  • Consistency70
  • Receiving30
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)45th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency70th %ile · average
Key findings
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.36 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.93 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Toledo (SP+ 7).

NIL Market Tier· 2021

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
Clyde Edwards-HelaireLSU0.4905.0105.8
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9300.93Wk 1 vs Michigan: -0.02 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Illinois State: +0.30 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Pittsburgh: +0.08 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs San José State: +0.06 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Buffalo: +0.30 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Ball State: -0.05 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Kent State: +0.57 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Toledo: +0.93 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Central Michigan: +0.40 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Akron: +0.89 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Eastern Michigan: +0.02 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Northern Illinois: +0.14 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Nevada: +0.46 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@MichiganL14-4723.410555.502130-0.02
2vsIllinois StateW28-015785.2113000.30
3@PittsburghW44-4117.614846.0131110.08
4vsSan José StateW23-3-1.912655.402800.06
5@BuffaloW24-17-9.514805.700.30
6vsBall StateL20-45-11.214523.70-0.05
7vsKent StateW64-31-6.4171699.910.57
8@ToledoL15-346.910484.8121600.93
10vsCentral MichiganL30-42-1.015593.920.40
11vsAkronW45-40-23.1161479.2122510.89
12@Eastern MichiganL21-22-7.810525.211400.02
13@Northern IllinoisW42-21-7.1171156.810.14
1vsNevadaW52-243.61414610.401700.46

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
20.4%
Passing plays
3.4%
Rushing plays
32.3%
Standard downs
22.0%
Passing downs
15.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.25
Passing downs
0.70
Pass / Rush EPA
0.58 / 0.32

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.030−0.14
EPA per play · 2021 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.