Skip to content
Jaret Patterson

#26Jaret Patterson

RB·Buffalo·2020201920185.6 pts line value1st Round

Jaret Patterson is a 3-year Featured Back for Buffalo. Jaret's 2019 season ranks in the 75th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 320 plays — a above-average rate for the RB. Jaret's production has improved each season, a positive development trajectory.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jaret Patterson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2019 Production

Rushing
1799 Rush yards19 Rush TD312 Carries5.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
13 Receptions209 Rec yards1 Rec TD16.1 Yards/rec
Returns
3 Kick returns16 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2019 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency75
  • Volume99
  • Explosiveness56
  • Consistency83
  • Receiving31
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)75th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency83th %ile · above avg
Career trajectory:↑ Rising
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the RB position (75th percentile).
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • Career trajectory is upward — WEPA value has improved season over season.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.12 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.85 EPA/play in Wk 14 vs Bowling Green (SP+ -28).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
D'Onta ForemanTexas0.3405.3112.9
Mohamed IbrahimMinnesota0.3305.3103.6
Cameron SkatteboArizona State0.4106.2126.7
Jonathan TaylorWisconsin0.3605.0106.9
Jonathan TaylorWisconsin0.3504.8107.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8500.85Wk 1 vs Robert Morris: +0.54 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Penn State: +0.18 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Liberty: +0.06 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Temple: +0.27 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Miami (OH): +0.43 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Ohio: +0.35 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Akron: +0.19 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Central Michigan: +0.32 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Eastern Michigan: +0.32 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Kent State: +0.15 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Toledo: +0.52 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Bowling Green: +0.85 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Charlotte: +0.41 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsRobert MorrisW38-1012907.511300.54
2@Penn StateL13-4524.323713.1011900.18
3@LibertyL17-35-2.617694.101600.06
4vsTempleW38-223.2271334.920.27
5@Miami (OH)L20-34-9.2221838.3111200.43
6vsOhioL20-213.713524.0016100.35
8@AkronW21-0-29.817885.202200.19
9vsCentral MichiganW43-20-4.4281495.3125900.32
10@Eastern MichiganW43-14-8.6331604.820.32
12@Kent StateL27-30-10.2301414.7011200.15
13vsToledoW49-30-13.7321926.0433510.52
14vsBowling GreenW49-7-27.52629811.560.85
1vsCharlotteW31-9-6.3321735.420.41

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
34.7%
Passing plays
5.9%
Rushing plays
48.0%
Standard downs
38.2%
Passing downs
25.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.32
Passing downs
0.46
Pass / Rush EPA
0.91 / 0.32

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.040−0.6120192020
EPA per play · 2018 — 2020 · 33 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2018Buffalo
2.7
63.6
2019Buffalo
5.6
118.0
2020Buffalo
8.7
86.9

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.