Skip to content
Rodney Smith

#1Rodney Smith

RB·Minnesota·201920162.4 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Rodney Smith is a 2-year Featured Back for Minnesota. Rodney's 2016 season ranks in the 18th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 261 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Rodney Smith's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2016 Production

Rushing
1158 Rush yards16 Rush TD240 Carries4.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
23 Receptions188 Rec yards0 Rec TD8.2 Yards/rec
Returns
8 Kick returns263 KR yards1 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2016 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency18
  • Volume84
  • Explosiveness36
  • Consistency38
  • Receiving47
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)18th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency38th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.18 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.61 EPA/play in Wk 7 vs Maryland (SP+ -1).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6100.61Wk 1 vs Oregon State: +0.15 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Indiana State: +0.11 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Colorado State: +0.38 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Penn State: +0.11 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Iowa: -0.24 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Maryland: +0.61 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Rutgers: +0.35 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Illinois: +0.25 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Purdue: +0.26 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Nebraska: -0.13 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Northwestern: -0.16 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Wisconsin: -0.14 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Washington State: -0.03 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsOregon StateW30-23-4.6251255.021200.15
2vsIndiana StateW58-2817744.4111400.11
4vsColorado StateW31-240.817995.8211500.38
5@Penn StateL26-2919.0231044.5043900.11
6vsIowaL7-1410.311444.00230-0.24
7@MarylandW31-10-0.6181448.0211000.61
8vsRutgersW34-32-14.9221115.0112700.35
9@IllinoisW40-17-6.7201005.0221900.25
10vsPurdueW44-31-11.0241536.4321000.26
11@NebraskaL17-2410.317533.113170-0.13
12vsNorthwesternW29-122.916322.01360-0.16
13@WisconsinL17-3116.113453.501250-0.14
1vsWashington StateW17-126.217744.41110-0.03

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
29.3%
Passing plays
7.6%
Rushing plays
44.3%
Standard downs
34.4%
Passing downs
19.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.15
Passing downs
0.10
Pass / Rush EPA
0.22 / 0.13

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.700−0.432019
EPA per play · 2016 — 2019 · 26 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2016Minnesota
2.4
66.4
2019Minnesota
1.8
54.5

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.