Skip to content
Quinshon Judkins
Quinshon Judkins

#1Quinshon Judkins

RB·Ole Miss·2024202320221.5 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Quinshon Judkins is a 3-year Featured Back for Ole Miss. Quinshon's 2023 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 291 plays — a developing rate for the RB. Quinshon's production has improved each season, a positive development trajectory.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Quinshon Judkins's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

Recruiting Profile· Class of 2022

3-Star · Developmental
Stars
247 composite
0.8804
National rank
#562
High school
Pike Road
Hometown
Pike Road, AL

Recruiting data from CFBD/247Sports composite. Sourced from the player's signing-class team — transfers show original school's class.

2023 Production

Rushing
1158 Rush yards15 Rush TD271 Carries4.3 Yards/carry
Receiving
22 Receptions149 Rec yards2 Rec TD6.8 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume91
  • Explosiveness26
  • Consistency26
  • Receiving36
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency26th %ile · below avg
Career trajectory:↑ Rising
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • Career trajectory is upward — WEPA value has improved season over season.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Peak game: 0.52 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Vanderbilt (SP+ -13).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Donnel PumphreySan Diego State0.3204.2110.1
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5200.52Wk 1 vs Mercer: +0.51 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Tulane: +0.01 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Georgia Tech: -0.04 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Alabama: -0.17 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs LSU: +0.09 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Arkansas: +0.04 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Auburn: +0.29 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Vanderbilt: +0.52 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Texas A&M: +0.08 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Georgia: +0.13 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs UL Monroe: -0.22 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Mississippi State: -0.12 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsMercerW73-713604.6221100.51
2@TulaneW37-202.818482.7133200.01
3vsGeorgia TechW48-230.313372.812270-0.04
4@AlabamaL10-2423.113564.301100-0.17
5vsLSUW55-4919.1331775.411410.09
6vsArkansasW27-203.518653.6131800.04
8@AuburnW28-217.6211245.910.29
9vsVanderbiltW33-7-12.7171247.321700.52
10vsTexas A&MW38-3515.6231024.4311000.08
11@GeorgiaL17-5231.222753.4231400.13
12vsUL MonroeW35-3-21.618653.601-30-0.22
13@Mississippi StateW17-70.5281194.31350-0.12
20vsPenn StateW38-2523.5341063.101141

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
32.0%
Passing plays
6.3%
Rushing plays
53.2%
Standard downs
38.2%
Passing downs
18.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.07
Passing downs
-0.00
Pass / Rush EPA
0.15 / 0.04

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.500−0.5320232024
EPA per play · 2022 — 2024 · 42 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2022Ole Miss
4.6
90.2
2023Ole Miss
1.5
48.6
2024Ohio State
3.3
79.4

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.