Skip to content
Larry Rountree III
Larry Rountree III

#34Larry Rountree III

RB·Missouri·202020181.9 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Larry Rountree III is a 2-year Explosive Back for Missouri. Larry's 2018 season ranks in the 3th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 210 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Larry Rountree III's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2018 Production

Rushing
1216 Rush yards11 Rush TD225 Carries5.4 Yards/carry
Receiving
14 Receptions62 Rec yards0 Rec TD4.4 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2018 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency3
  • Volume67
  • Explosiveness48
  • Consistency47
  • Receiving29
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)3th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency47th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Peak game: 0.80 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Memphis (SP+ 9).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8000.80Wk 1 vs UT Martin: +0.17 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Wyoming: -0.31 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Purdue: +0.36 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Georgia: +0.06 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs South Carolina: +0.45 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Alabama: -0.07 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Memphis: +0.80 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Kentucky: +0.02 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Florida: +0.07 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Vanderbilt: +0.06 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Tennessee: +0.23 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Arkansas: -0.14 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Oklahoma State: +0.34 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsUT MartinW51-1414584.111-400.17
2vsWyomingW40-131.910343.40-0.31
3@PurdueW40-376.5231687.301800.36
4vsGeorgiaL29-4332.98334.111200.06
6@South CarolinaL35-3714.913906.920.45
7@AlabamaL10-3936.317482.802130-0.07
8vsMemphisW65-339.2911813.130.80
9vsKentuckyL14-1513.114453.210.02
10@FloridaW38-1723.014725.1141000.07
11vsVanderbiltW33-287.621924.401200.06
12@TennesseeW50-175.5261355.2111800.23
13vsArkansasW38-04.5291194.102100-0.14
1vsOklahoma StateL33-3813.8272047.611300.34

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
23.4%
Passing plays
3.7%
Rushing plays
41.0%
Standard downs
27.1%
Passing downs
14.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.19
Passing downs
0.13
Pass / Rush EPA
0.07 / 0.19

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.910−0.432020
EPA per play · 2018 — 2020 · 23 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2018Missouri
1.9
55.2
2020Missouri
2.0
54.8

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.