Skip to content
Kapri Bibbs

#5Kapri Bibbs

RB·Colorado State·20132.1 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Kapri Bibbs is a Featured Back for Colorado State. Kapri's 2013 season ranks in the 35th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 247 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Kapri Bibbs's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2013 Production

Rushing
1741 Rush yards31 Rush TD281 Carries6.2 Yards/carry
Receiving
8 Receptions59 Rec yards0 Rec TD7.4 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2013 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency35
  • Volume74
  • Explosiveness64
  • Consistency74
  • Receiving13
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)35th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency74th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.14 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.56 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Tulsa (SP+ -19).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3
Donnel PumphreySan Diego State0.3204.2110.1

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5600.56Wk 1 vs Colorado: +0.20 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Tulsa: +0.56 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Cal Poly: +0.33 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Alabama: +0.21 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs UTEP: +0.34 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs San José State: +0.10 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Wyoming: +0.15 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Hawai'i: -0.13 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Boise State: +0.14 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Nevada: +0.15 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs New Mexico: +0.29 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Utah State: -0.10 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Air Force: +0.42 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Washington State: +0.17 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsColoradoL27-41-0.715704.721100.20
2@TulsaL27-30-18.79839.200.56
3vsCal PolyW34-1711484.4111400.33
4@AlabamaL6-3134.15122.4011200.21
5vsUTEPW59-42-28.91314711.331700.34
7vsSan José StateL27-34-5.112695.800.10
8@WyomingW52-22-15.3292016.930.15
9@Hawai'iW35-28-14.3331374.23-0.13
10vsBoise StateL30-4211.325692.830.14
11vsNevadaW38-17-16.83031210.441200.15
12@New MexicoW66-42-14.9382917.760.29
13@Utah StateL0-134.218543.00140-0.10
14vsAir ForceW58-13-16.916794.9311300.42
1vsWashington StateW48-458.2271696.331600.17

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
26.0%
Passing plays
1.8%
Rushing plays
48.5%
Standard downs
32.7%
Passing downs
10.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.13
Passing downs
0.28
Pass / Rush EPA
0.68 / 0.13

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.630−0.20
EPA per play · 2013 · 14 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.