Skip to content
Kaelon Black

#8Kaelon Black

RB·Indiana·20251.5 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Kaelon Black is a Explosive Back for Indiana. Kaelon's 2025 season ranks in the 25th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 173 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Kaelon Black's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
1039 Rush yards10 Rush TD187 Carries5.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
4 Receptions36 Rec yards0 Rec TD9.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency25
  • Volume51
  • Explosiveness52
  • Consistency47
  • Receiving14
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)25th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency47th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.15 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.76 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Indiana State.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7600.76Wk 1 vs Old Dominion: +0.28 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Kennesaw State: +0.08 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Indiana State: +0.76 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Illinois: +0.55 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Iowa: -0.29 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Oregon: -0.19 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Michigan State: +0.35 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs UCLA: +0.37 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Maryland: +0.48 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Penn State: -0.03 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Wisconsin: -0.13 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Purdue: +0.28 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Ohio State: -0.19 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsOld DominionW27-145.917925.410.28
2vsKennesaw StateW56-9-5.410575.700.08
3vsIndiana StateW73-07689.700.76
4vsIllinoisW63-1012.910898.910.55
5@IowaW20-1519.711383.50-0.29
7@OregonW30-2025.97314.40-0.19
8vsMichigan StateW38-13-3.410646.410.35
9vsUCLAW56-6-8.710707.0011000.37
10@MarylandW55-100.6141107.910.48
11@Penn StateW27-2418.112322.71-0.03
12vsWisconsinW31-7-4.46122.00190-0.13
14@PurdueW56-3-6.113665.121600.28
15vsOhio StateW13-1030.116694.30-0.19
20vsOregonW56-2225.912635.32
20vsAlabamaW38-314.815996.611110
20vsMiamiW27-2120.717794.60

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
17.8%
Passing plays
1.4%
Rushing plays
29.4%
Standard downs
19.0%
Passing downs
14.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.13
Passing downs
0.28
Pass / Rush EPA
0.16 / 0.16

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.870−0.40
EPA per play · 2025 · 16 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.