Skip to content
Justice Haynes

#22Justice Haynes

RB·Michigan·20253.6 pts line value1st Round

Justice Haynes is a Featured Back for Michigan. Justice's 2025 season ranks in the 98th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 127 plays — a elite rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Justice Haynes's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
857 Rush yards10 Rush TD121 Carries7.1 Yards/carry
Receiving
13 Receptions50 Rec yards0 Rec TD3.8 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency98
  • Volume87
  • Explosiveness82
  • Consistency82
  • Receiving52
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)98th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency82th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among RBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.09 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.63 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs New Mexico (SP+ 1).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Clyde Edwards-HelaireLSU0.4905.0105.8
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
Devon JohnsonMarshall0.5206.0108.2
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.4505.8102.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6300.63Wk 1 vs New Mexico: +0.63 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Oklahoma: +0.05 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Central Michigan: +0.32 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Nebraska: +0.54 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Wisconsin: +0.31 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs USC: +0.10 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Michigan State: +0.31 EPA/play9
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsNew MexicoW34-170.9161599.932600.63
2@OklahomaL13-2418.3191256.613-500.05
3vsCentral MichiganW63-3-8.8141047.4111600.32
4@NebraskaW30-276.2171498.8131200.54
6vsWisconsinW24-10-4.4191176.220.31
7@USCL13-3116.910515.101200.10
9@Michigan StateW31-20-3.4261525.8231900.31

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
30.5%
Passing plays
8.8%
Rushing plays
46.3%
Standard downs
33.0%
Passing downs
24.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.32
Passing downs
0.26
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.05 / 0.36

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.680−0.01
EPA per play · 2025 · 7 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.