Skip to content
Jordan Mims

#7Jordan Mims

RB·Fresno State·20222.6 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Jordan Mims is a Featured Back for Fresno State. Jordan's 2022 season ranks in the 23th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 223 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jordan Mims's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2022 Production

Rushing
1371 Rush yards18 Rush TD260 Carries5.3 Yards/carry
Receiving
20 Receptions117 Rec yards1 Rec TD5.8 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2022 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency23
  • Volume81
  • Explosiveness46
  • Consistency52
  • Receiving26
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)23th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency52th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.95 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Washington State (SP+ 10).

NIL Market Tier· 2022

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9500.95Wk 1 vs Cal Poly: +0.23 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Oregon State: +0.32 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs USC: +0.24 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs UConn: -0.21 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Boise State: -0.04 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs San José State: +0.41 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs New Mexico: +0.28 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs San Diego State: -0.30 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Hawai'i: +0.39 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Nevada: +0.17 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Wyoming: +0.14 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Boise State: -0.09 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Washington State: +0.95 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsCal PolyW35-715734.9242510.23
2vsOregon StateL32-3514.3211225.8232700.32
3@USCL17-4518.9151147.600.24
5@UConnL14-19-14.615392.61-0.21
6@Boise StateL20-405.721612.904200-0.04
7vsSan José StateW17-10-4.316714.410.41
8@New MexicoW41-9-26.9261656.310.28
9vsSan Diego StateW32-28-4.413322.51140-0.30
10vsHawai'iW55-13-24.7181236.810.39
11@UNLVW37-30-11.921703.31220
12@NevadaW41-14-22.4191568.210.17
13vsWyomingW30-0-10.816523.331700.14
14@Boise StateW28-165.726833.22350-0.09
1vsWashington StateW29-69.51821011.7222700.95

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
28.2%
Passing plays
4.0%
Rushing plays
56.6%
Standard downs
34.3%
Passing downs
12.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.12
Passing downs
0.33
Pass / Rush EPA
0.15 / 0.15

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.070−0.43
EPA per play · 2022 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.