Skip to content
Dontrell Hilliard
Dontrell Hilliard

#26Dontrell Hilliard

RB·Tulane·20173.1 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Dontrell Hilliard is a Featured Back for Tulane. Dontrell's 2017 season ranks in the 45th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 190 plays — a average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Dontrell Hilliard's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2017 Production

Rushing
1091 Rush yards12 Rush TD210 Carries5.2 Yards/carry
Receiving
8 Receptions115 Rec yards2 Rec TD14.4 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Punt returns0 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2017 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency45
  • Volume76
  • Explosiveness44
  • Consistency57
  • Receiving25
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)45th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency57th %ile · average
Key findings
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.57 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.04 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Tulsa (SP+ -11).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Nick WilsonArizona0.4105.2102.5

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.0401.04Wk 1 vs Grambling: +0.31 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs Oklahoma: +0.41 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Army: +0.44 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Tulsa: +1.04 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Florida International: +0.63 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs South Florida: +0.04 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Memphis: -0.12 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Cincinnati: -0.24 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs East Carolina: +0.35 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Houston: -0.18 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs SMU: +0.14 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsGramblingW43-1411363.3027710.31
2@NavyL21-23-0.715684.51100
3@OklahomaL14-5625.5191045.510.41
4vsArmyW21-17-5.3141349.610.44
6vsTulsaW62-28-10.7191759.2411101.04
7@Florida InternationalL10-23-10.412907.511200.63
8vsSouth FloridaL28-3410.224943.9112410.04
9@MemphisL26-567.819673.50160-0.12
10vsCincinnatiL16-17-6.418402.20-0.24
11@East CarolinaW31-24-14.0281896.821-500.35
12vsHoustonW20-177.718522.90-0.18
13@SMUL38-41-2.913423.210.14

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
26.6%
Passing plays
3.6%
Rushing plays
38.2%
Standard downs
31.7%
Passing downs
16.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.14
Passing downs
0.52
Pass / Rush EPA
1.39 / 0.17

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.170−0.37
EPA per play · 2017 · 11 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.