Skip to content
Darius Taylor

#1Darius Taylor

RB·Minnesota·20242.1 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Darius Taylor is a Pass-Catching Back for Minnesota. Darius's 2024 season ranks in the 15th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 246 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Darius Taylor's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Rushing
986 Rush yards10 Rush TD205 Carries4.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
54 Receptions350 Rec yards2 Rec TD6.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency15
  • Volume97
  • Explosiveness36
  • Consistency53
  • Receiving76
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)15th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency53th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.38 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.04 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Nevada (SP+ -15).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.0401.04Wk 2 vs Rhode Island: +0.40 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Nevada: +1.04 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Iowa: +0.12 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Michigan: +0.34 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs USC: +0.13 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs UCLA: +0.27 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Maryland: -0.03 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Illinois: +0.38 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Rutgers: -0.28 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Penn State: -0.07 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Wisconsin: +0.02 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
2vsRhode IslandW48-014644.6144800.40
3vsNevadaW27-0-15.21112411.3253711.04
4vsIowaL14-3115.810343.4021300.12
5@MichiganL24-2710.613362.82105200.34
6vsUSCW24-1711.9251445.8055600.13
7@UCLAW21-17-1.316301.9131710.27
9vsMarylandW48-23-3.915815.415340-0.03
10@IllinoisW25-179.6221316.0195800.38
11@RutgersL19-266.410282.812-30-0.28
13vsPenn StateL25-2624.617583.40380-0.07
14@WisconsinW24-73.0321434.5021300.02
20vsVirginia TechW24-1010.0201135.714170

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
33.8%
Passing plays
14.1%
Rushing plays
56.7%
Standard downs
36.3%
Passing downs
27.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.15
Passing downs
0.38
Pass / Rush EPA
0.47 / 0.12

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.180−0.42
EPA per play · 2024 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.