Skip to content
Dae Dae Hunter

Dae Dae Hunter

RB·Liberty·20222.4 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Dae Dae Hunter is a Explosive Back for Liberty. Dae's 2022 season ranks in the 70th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 142 plays — a average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Dae Dae Hunter's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2022 Production

Rushing
850 Rush yards8 Rush TD129 Carries6.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
17 Receptions147 Rec yards1 Rec TD8.6 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns19 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2022 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency70
  • Volume64
  • Explosiveness72
  • Consistency74
  • Receiving48
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)70th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency74th %ile · average
Key findings
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.20 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.79 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs BYU (SP+ -1).

NIL Market Tier· 2022

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Clyde Edwards-HelaireLSU0.4905.0105.8
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
Nick WilsonArizona0.4105.2102.5
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7900.79Wk 1 vs Southern Miss: -0.09 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs UAB: +0.21 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Wake Forest: +0.27 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Akron: +0.28 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Old Dominion: +0.78 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Massachusetts: +0.12 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Gardner-Webb: +0.49 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs BYU: +0.79 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Arkansas: +0.09 EPA/play10
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@Southern MissW29-27-3.511625.60120-0.09
2vsUABW21-14-0.510646.412800.21
3@Wake ForestL36-378.217895.2152100.27
4vsAkronW21-12-23.4181186.610.28
5@Old DominionW38-24-13.0151218.1236010.78
6@MassachusettsW42-24-30.317784.610.12
7vsGardner-WebbW21-209768.4122500.49
8vsBYUW41-14-1.4232139.3143100.79
10@ArkansasW21-1912.09293.200.09

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
22.5%
Passing plays
6.0%
Rushing plays
37.0%
Standard downs
25.0%
Passing downs
17.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.43
Passing downs
0.25
Pass / Rush EPA
0.71 / 0.34

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.870−0.18
EPA per play · 2022 · 9 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.