Skip to content
Cody Schrader

#7Cody Schrader

RB·Missouri·20233.1 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Cody Schrader is a Featured Back for Missouri. Cody's 2023 season ranks in the 18th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 293 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Cody Schrader's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Rushing
1617 Rush yards14 Rush TD276 Carries5.9 Yards/carry
Receiving
22 Receptions191 Rec yards0 Rec TD8.7 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency18
  • Volume98
  • Explosiveness58
  • Consistency64
  • Receiving31
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)18th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency64th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • Peak game: 0.66 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs LSU (SP+ 19).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3
Donnel PumphreySan Diego State0.3204.2110.1

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6600.66Wk 1 vs South Dakota: +0.37 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Middle Tennessee: -0.11 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Kansas State: -0.06 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Memphis: +0.65 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Vanderbilt: -0.08 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs LSU: +0.66 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Kentucky: -0.03 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs South Carolina: +0.29 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Georgia: +0.17 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Tennessee: +0.36 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Florida: +0.09 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Arkansas: +0.23 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsSouth DakotaW35-10181387.7131300.37
2vsMiddle TennesseeW23-19-9.523843.70-0.11
3vsKansas StateW30-2716.210585.80160-0.06
4vsMemphisW34-273.5141238.810.65
5@VanderbiltW38-21-12.716603.81150-0.08
6vsLSUL39-4919.1131148.8321100.66
7@KentuckyW38-2110.520713.613150-0.03
8vsSouth CarolinaW34-124.3261596.1221100.29
10@GeorgiaL21-3031.2221125.1131400.17
11vsTennesseeW36-716.2352055.91511600.36
12vsFloridaW33-316.8231486.412000.09
13@ArkansasW48-143.5272178.010.23
20vsOhio StateW14-325.2291284.41

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
34.3%
Passing plays
5.9%
Rushing plays
58.2%
Standard downs
41.5%
Passing downs
17.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.18
Passing downs
0.28
Pass / Rush EPA
0.47 / 0.17

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.740−0.19
EPA per play · 2023 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.