Skip to content
Aidan O'Connell

#16Aidan O'Connell

QB·Purdue·2022202112.5 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Aidan O'Connell is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Purdue. Aidan's 2021 season ranks in the 88th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 423 plays — a above-average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Aidan O'Connell's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2021 Production

Passing
315/440 Comp/Att3712 Pass yards28 Pass TD11 INT71.6% Comp %
Rushing
-120 Rush yards1 Rush TD25 Carries-4.8 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2021 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency88
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency84
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)88th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency84th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the QB position (88th percentile).
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.79 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs UConn (SP+ -26).

NIL Market Tier· 2021

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5
Kaidon SalterLiberty0.71114.7345.6
Malik CunninghamLouisville0.68114.7341.6
Blake SimsAlabama0.69615.4329.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7900.79Wk 2 vs UConn: +0.79 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Notre Dame: +0.01 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Illinois: +0.71 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Minnesota: +0.31 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Iowa: +0.68 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Wisconsin: +0.14 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Nebraska: +0.15 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Michigan State: +0.72 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Ohio State: +0.50 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Northwestern: +0.55 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Indiana: +0.60 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Tennessee: +0.42 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
2@UConnW49-0-25.69/11862094.80.79
3@Notre DameL13-2717.411/181040264.9800.01
4vsIllinoisW13-94.312/191821261.5-1000.71
5vsMinnesotaL13-2014.434/523711172.7-4400.31
7@IowaW24-711.430/403752098.3-210.68
8vsWisconsinL13-3020.124/322001353.6-3500.14
9@NebraskaW28-2310.334/452332085.3-900.15
10vsMichigan StateW40-2911.240/545363095.4-1300.72
11@Ohio StateL31-5929.340/523904091.60.50
12vsNorthwesternW32-14-11.129/394233087.5-700.55
13vsIndianaW44-7-7.826/312784086.0100.60
1vsTennesseeW48-4517.526/475345376.2-900.42

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
51.5%
Passing plays
80.0%
Rushing plays
2.5%
Standard downs
43.3%
Passing downs
71.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.30
Passing downs
0.68
Pass / Rush EPA
0.45 / 0.68

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.030−0.362022
EPA per play · 2021 — 2022 · 24 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2021Purdue
12.5
302.9
2022Purdue
7.4
237.4

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.