Skip to content

Utah Valley

In progress. College basketball is still being built and is not in the navigation. The ratings are ours and are shown with the date they were fitted; they are not graded in public.

UAC · 18-12 · AdjEM +5.0, 107 of 359 nationally.

2021-22 seasonthrough ratings as of 2022-04-0421 weekly snapshots

Adjusted ratingas of 2022-04-04

Every team →
AdjEM
+5.0107 of 359
AdjO
101.4166 of 359
AdjD
96.473 of 359
AdjT
68.5247 of 359

Utah Valley went from +0.9 (#143) on 2021-11-15 to +5.0 (#107) on 2022-04-04, peaking at +8.1 (#63) on 2022-01-03.

AdjEM in each weekly snapshot this season; the dashed line is an average D1 team (0).

2021-11-152022-04-04

Four factorsraw season rates · 30 complete games

Leaderboards →
eFG%
50.6%142
TOV%
20.6%343
OREB%
29.9%69
FTA/FGA
38.1%18
Opp eFG%
45.4%17
Opp TOV%
14.5%327
DREB%
77.1%57
Opp FTA/FGA
28.3%125

Résumé18-12 · against the ratings of 2022-04-04

Schedule strength
-0.8190 of 359
Non-conference
+0.5192 of 359
Luck
-0.8%184 of 359
Wins above bubble
-4.2123 of 359
Quad 1
0-3
Quad 2
2-3
Quad 3
6-5
Quad 4
10-1

Quadrants use the selection committee's boundaries (Quad 1 is a home game against the top 30, a neutral one against the top 50, or a road game against the top 75) applied to our ranking, not to the NCAA's NET, so they will not match a NET team sheet game for game. Luck and wins above bubble compare the record with today's ratings; they are not a record of our projections.

Players15 who played · most minutes first

National leaders →
PlayerGMPGPPGRPGAPGeFG%TS%USG%3P%FT%
Fardaws AimaqF3234.418.913.61.751.2%55.4%29.9%43.5%72.3%
Connor HardingG3231.810.44.32.851.1%53.9%20.3%36.8%67.8%
Blaze NieldG3227.16.92.33.954.2%57.6%15.3%37.9%74.1%
Le'Tre DarthardG2827.39.82.51.450.7%55.6%18.5%37.6%84.8%
Tim FullerF3121.76.84.40.858.1%56.1%17.0%0.0%42.6%
Justin HarmonG2125.310.93.81.444.0%51.0%26.1%29.7%78.2%
Tim CeaserF3015.03.53.80.961.3%63.8%12.9%38.7%82.4%
Jaden McClanahanG2215.83.71.62.046.4%48.9%16.5%42.9%58.6%
Asa McCordF2511.23.51.90.750.8%55.9%16.8%35.1%80.0%
Trey FarrerF2210.32.92.10.248.8%59.5%15.8%11.1%86.2%
Jordan BattleG196.80.81.10.732.5%32.8%12.6%37.5%33.3%
Colby LeifsonG155.32.20.30.161.1%61.1%17.3%44.0%—
Trey WoodburyG220.57.53.52.533.3%42.0%27.3%25.0%83.3%
Brock AndersonF33.31.01.30.050.0%50.8%15.1%—50.0%
Tyrel PhillipsG13.00.01.00.00.0%0.0%51.3%0.0%—

Season totals for every game played, from ESPN's statistics feed. In seasons before 2025-26 a roster can be missing a player or hold one who was elsewhere; usage is blank where the players listed do not add up to the team's minutes.

Games18-12

“Ours” is our projected margin for Utah Valley, from the snapshot dated before each game. Games before the season's first snapshot have none.

DateOpponentQuadResultOurs
11-09@Boise StateQ1#38L 56-76—
11-15@PepperdineQ4#291W 86-74—
11-17@Long Beach StateQ3#183W 84-78-14.2
11-22nIdahoQ4#328W 83-45+2.3
11-24nNichollsQ3#169W 74-63+3.6
11-27vsDenverQ4#284W 77-68+14.6
12-01vsBYUQ2#54W 72-65+6.3
12-08@Southern UtahQ3#161L 56-60-5.4
12-11@WyomingQ1#66L 62-74-13.8
12-21@WashingtonQ3#140W 68-52+0.1
12-30vsAbilene ChristianQ3#128L 76-80+7.2
01-01vsTarleton StateQ4#191W 77-55+9.4
01-08vsUtah TechQ4#296W 79-71+19.4
01-12@Seattle UQ2#123L 65-71-1.6
01-15@California BaptistQ3#215L 73-75+1.6
01-20vsUT Rio Grande ValleyQ4#298W 66-56+13.2
01-22vsLamarQ4#347W 58-41+18.3
01-27@Chicago StateQ4#341W 101-87+9.1
02-03@Stephen F. AustinQ2#120L 59-78+0.1
02-05@Sam HoustonQ3#156W 57-54+1.2
02-10vsGrand CanyonQ3#76L 69-79+3.1
02-12vsNew Mexico StateQ2#59W 72-68+2.1
02-16@Tarleton StateQ3#191W 69-56+0.1
02-19@Utah TechQ4#296L 75-80+6.1
02-24vsSeattle UQ3#123W 67-52+4.0
02-26vsCalifornia BaptistQ4#215W 63-54+8.5
03-03@Grand CanyonQ2#76L 57-68-5.0
03-05@New Mexico StateQ1#59L 46-62-5.2
03-08nChicago StateQ4#341W 69-47+13.4
03-09nAbilene ChristianQ3#128L 74-82+1.5

How this is measured

Ranks are out of 359 rated teams, 1 = best (for AdjD and the defensive factors, 1 = allowed the least). The four factors are raw season rates from box scores.

Every projection uses a rating snapshot dated before the game — the snapshot column shows which. A snapshot dated on or after a game already contains its result, so it is never used to project it; a game before the season's first snapshot gets no number at all. Projected margin is (this team's AdjEM − the opponent's ± home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100.