Skip to content

Tulane Green Wave

American Athletic·1-1·
Elo
1529#58
SP+
-7.4#95
FPI
-0.5
AP
NR
Next@ Kansas State · Wk 3Win prob 17%Model +14.9
Talent #70 (665.1)Recruiting class #6421% production returning

Roster · 119 players

FR 48SO 29JR 21SR 21
#PlayerPosClHtWt
3Kadin SemonzaQBJR5'11"195
4Jay BeamonQBFR6'4"212
7Cade ScottQBFR6'5"216
9Zeon Chriss-GremillionQBSR6'3"220
11Trace JohnsonQBFR6'1"194
14Dagan BrunoQBSO6'2"200
23Holt TeichmanQBFR6'2"173
0Maurice TurnerRBSR5'10"196
6Johnnie DanielsRBSR5'10"209
12Jaylin LucasRBSR5'9"174
20Gabe MocekRBFR6'0"221
21DJ DugarRBFR6'1"212
24Jake RandleRBFR5'10"193
25Jamauri McClureRBSO5'10"212
32Jordan WestRBJR5'8"192
1Zycarl Lewis Jr.WRSO5'10"170
2Destyn HillWRJR6'1"191
5Marquez StevensonWRSR6'0"190
5Anthony Brown-StephensWRSR5'10"178
8Bredell RichardsonWRSO6'1"197
10Kellen TasbyWRSO6'6"229
15Antwaun ParhamWRFR6'4"214
16Garrett MmahatWRSR6'0"197
17Oliver Mitchell Jr.WRSO6'1"185
26Walker DavisWRSO6'0"200
37Cash SemonzaWRFR5'10"178
39John BartonWRFR5'11"214
81Deuce Hadley Jr.WRFR6'2"173
82Keyshaun ColemanWRFR6'4"200
83Seth GaleWRSO5'10"171
85Gabe DanielsWRSO6'2"190
13Ty ThompsonTESR6'4"235
19Dawson JohnsonTESO6'3"232
22Jakson JudgeTEJR6'1"209
38Evan MickowTEFR6'5"216
80Vance BolyardTEJR6'5"240
86Gabe LovornTEFR6'4"241
87Cameron RobertsTEFR6'5"237
88Colby SimpsonTEFR6'6"247
89DJ CiceroTESO6'3"226
51John Bock IIOLSR6'3"316
52Tristen FortenberryOLSO6'6"315
55Dominic StewardOLSO6'5"280
58Ryan MickowOLJR6'7"311
59Andre Amos Jr.OLFR6'5"335
60Gavin MarksOLSO6'3"297
61Leo WulffraatOLSO6'2"225
62Aiden MartinOLFR6'5"308
65Brady WyattOLFR6'6"310
67Tylan GeorgeOLFR6'3"319
68Robbie PizzolatoOLSR6'4"311
70Juelz BaptisteOLFR6'5"323
71Riley RushingOLJR6'4"322
72Mitch HodnettOLSO6'5"294
73Elijah BakerOLSO6'3"295
74Jaxon DucreOLSO6'3"252
75Colin O'CarrollOLSO6'2"291
76Gresham PerryOLFR6'4"322
77Darion ReedOLJR6'7"314
78Reese BakerOLSO6'5"292
6Kameron HamiltonDESR6'4"292
10Gerrod HendersonDESR6'2"267
15Jordan McAllisterDEJR6'3"254
40Warren Roberts Jr.DEFR6'2"219
48Jah'rie GarnerDEJR6'3"234
58Cayden DeesDEFR6'3"259
89Miles SmithDEFR6'1"206
45Ed Smith IVDLSR6'3"306
51Reshad SterlingDLFR6'3"271
53Jack StiversDLSO6'3"276
55Nick WitherspoonDLFR6'3"345
69AJ WestfieldDLFR6'3"280
90Jordyn CritesDLFR6'7"274
91Jackson NorwoodDLFR6'3"302
92Armondous CooleyDLSR6'3"305
94Derrick Shepard Jr.DLSR6'3"313
96Geordan GuidryDLSO6'2"282
97Nikolas AlstonDLFR6'3"270
98PaLanding DrammehDLFR6'2"292
99Josh LewisDLFR6'5"260
2Dickson AguLBJR6'2"223
4Chris RodgersLBSR6'1"222
11Dalton HughesLBSR6'3"226
28Dylan BrasherLBFR6'2"218
41Chan LumpkinLBFR6'4"228
42Makai WilliamsLBSR6'1"231
43Grayson McPhersonLBFR6'3"221
44Jean Claude Joseph IIILBJR6'0"223
47Zach DreschLBFR6'3"222
54Jeffrey CurtisLBFR5'9"199
0Shaun NicholasCBJR6'4"196
5E'zaiah ShineCBSO6'1"201
14Armani CargoCBSO5'10"183
21Macho StevensonCBJR6'1"187
22Justin AguCBSR6'2"190
22LJ GreenCBJR5'10"172
3TJ SmithDBSR5'10"183
6Josh SimsDBFR6'0"192
12Anthony RogersDBSO5'11"176
13Kajuan BanksDBSR5'10"189
20Myrone JeanDBFR6'4"186
23Orion SaundersDBFR6'4"187
24Michael IgbinogheneDBFR5'10"198
30Joshua MooreDBJR6'2"202
30Syre GilmoreDBFR5'10"195
36Lawrence MotonDBFR6'4"186
1Jack TchienchouSJR5'10"192
7Kevin Adams IIISJR5'10"195
26Dorion JacksonSJR6'2"211
27Chase GreenSSO5'10"200
31Carson KleinSSO6'2"209
35Cooper HelmkePKFR6'3"202
46Zach MariniPKSO5'11"172
96Jackson CourvillePKJR5'10"184
33Brooks MoorePFR6'1"212
34William HudlowPJR5'11"215
38John AllenPFR6'4"189
57Jason ArredondoLSSO5'10"219
63Graham CoadyLSFR6'1"194

Team Statistics · per game, with national FBS rank

Points / game
15.5
scoring offense
Points allowed
20.5
scoring defense
Differential
-5.0
per game
Offense
Total yards / game
258.0#127
Yards / play
4.6#118
Passing yards / game
204.0#91
Rushing yards / game
54.0#129
First downs / game
10.0#132
3rd down %
21.4%#126
4th down %
0.0%#108
Time of possession
23:25#131
Defense
Yards allowed / game
381.0#96
Yards / play allowed
4.9#67
Pass yards allowed / game
131.0#31
Rush yards allowed / game
250.0#130
3rd down % allowed
44.4%#103
Sacks
0#130
Tackles for loss
0#138
Turnovers & Discipline
Turnover margin
0#66
Takeaways
1#88
Giveaways
1#31
Penalties / game
15.0#138
Penalty yards / game
104.0#134

Rank is national among all FBS teams (#1 = best), oriented so higher rank = better even for defensive and discipline metrics. Bars show percentile.

Scouting Report · 2026 projection

run-leaning

Tulane runs it: Will Hall's offenses have been run-leaning across 4 seasons. The strengths are defensive, led by 23rd at keeping everything in front of them. The way in is 116th at hitting chunk plays.

On fourth down he goes for it about as often as his peers do from the same spots (−1.5%). Against what the expected-points model recommends he is −27.2% — the profession as a whole is negative on this.

Tulane has played 1 game against a genuinely tough slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 0% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.

Projected strengths

  • Defensehitting chunk plays
    #23
    projected

Projected soft spots

  • Offensehitting chunk plays
    #116
    projected

Each bar is where this team sits in the country. Before the season has produced enough football these are PROJECTIONS — last season regressed to the mean, plus talent, returning production, recruiting and whether the staff is the same one — and the season replaces them as it is played. Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.

2026 Season Projection

model win prob · 10 to play
5.46.6
projected final record (now 11)
Exp. wins left
4.4
of 10 games
Bowl odds
48%
reach 6 wins
Best odds
74%
vs Charlotte
Toughest
17%
vs Kansas State

How the season could finish · 2026 · chance of each final win total · 10 games left

Every remaining game simulated from the model's win probability for it. Tallest bar is the single likeliest finish, not a prediction that it happens.

1234567891011
final winstallest bar = 26% chance
Likeliest finish 5-7 (26%)Bowl eligible 48% · marked on the axis at 6

Player Value

EPA contribution by position group + estimated NIL market value (derived from position rates and on-field production — not actual deal figures).

Unit Value — Total EPA
RBMaurice Turner, Jaylin Lucas +1
+2.4 EPA
WRAnthony Brown, Zycarl Lewis Jr. +4
-0.4 EPA
QBZeon Chriss, Kadin Semonza
-0.5 EPA
TETy Thompson
-0.6 EPA

Total EPA produced by each positional group this season. OL value is captured via the rush/pass efficiency of skill players; OL-specific EPA isn't separately reported.

Estimated NIL Market Value
ESTIMATED
EPA -2.0-0.078/play26 snaps

Estimated from position-group market rates and on-field EPA contribution. Actual NIL valuations depend on social media following, brand fit, and market negotiations — these figures are directional only.

The Five Factors

ranked vs. FBS · bar = better
Efficiency (PPA)
Off0.0012th#122
Def-0.0577th#33
Explosiveness
Off0.801st#136
Def1.2458th#58
Field position
Off74.983rd#24
Def67.291st#14
Finishing (pts/opp)
Off0.754th#132
Def2.1379th#30
Turnovers
Won 1Lost 1
Margin 0

Opponent-adjusted efficiency

EPA/play vs. schedule
Offense
Defense
Off · pass
0.1118th#113
Off · rush
-0.246th#130

Pass vs. rush (PPA)

Rushing
Off-0.246th#130
Def0.1138th#86
Passing
Off0.1118th#113
Def-0.1795th#8

Trenches & disruption

Line yards (off)
2.96#80
2nd-level / open-field
0.39 / 1.26
Power / stuff (off)
100.0% / 13.0%
Havoc — total (def)
9.0%#136
Havoc — front 7 / DB
2.6% / 6.4%

Standard vs. passing downs

Pro
Std downs
Off0.11
Def-0.17
Pass downs
Off-0.20
Def0.13

PPA on each down type (off vs. def).

Opponent-adjusted by down

Pro
1st2nd3rd
Offense-0.02#94-0.26#1260.32#104
Defense-0.09#54-0.25#180.81#119

Elo Trajectory

@DukeFinal
Elo rating 15551528-27 over season

Team Fingerprint · 2026 · 43 opponent-adjusted metrics · percentile vs 138 FBS teams

Plot these →
worst in FBSbest

Efficiency

  • Offense EPA/play0.0015th
  • Defense EPA/play allowed-0.0569th
  • Offense success rate31%9th
  • Defense success rate allowed29%75th

Downs

  • Offense success — standard downs47%40th
  • Offense success — passing downs0%1st
  • Defense success allowed — standard downs32%81st
  • Defense success allowed — passing downs26%53rd

Explosiveness

  • Offense explosiveness0.802nd
  • Defense explosiveness allowed1.247th
  • Offense explosiveness — standard downs0.8014th
  • Offense explosiveness — passing downs0.001st

Trenches

  • Offense line yards3.042nd
  • Defense line yards allowed3.031st
  • Offense highlight yards1.358th
  • Defense highlight yards allowed1.231st
  • Offense power success1.099th
  • Defense power success allowed1.023rd
  • Offense stuff rate0.1369th
  • Defense stuff rate0.1843rd

Third down

  • Third down conversion21%11th
  • Third down distance faced9.53rd
  • Third down conversion allowed47%23rd
  • Third down distance forced7.044th

Halves

  • Net success rate — first half-0.0135th
  • Net success rate — second half-0.0136th

Drives

  • Points per drive0.259th
  • Points per drive allowed1.470th
  • Average starting field position2533rd
  • Opponent starting field position3225th
  • Available yards gained27%14th
  • Available yards allowed48%48th
  • Scoring opportunities per drive67%25th
  • Scoring opportunities allowed83%42nd
  • Points per scoring opportunity0.388th
  • Points allowed per opportunity1.775th
  • Three-and-out rate42%20th
  • Three-and-outs forced33%70th

Roster

  • Returning usage19%19th
  • Returning EPA72.536th
  • Team talent composite66550th
  • Recruiting class rank64.054th
  • Recruiting class points19554th

Every metric is opponent-adjusted and ranked so that higher is always better — a defensive rate that is good when low is ranked accordingly. Sack and tackle-for-loss composition are deliberately absent: their relationship to team quality is a measured null, so they carry a style rather than a rank, and they appear in the pressure signature instead.

Intelligence Report

Offensive DNA

Pass-dominant offense — below average EPA/play nationally
EPA/play
+0.004#122 · bottom 20%
Pass EPA/play
+0.113#113
Rush EPA/play
-0.240#130
Explosiveness
0.797#136
Pts/opportunity
0.75#132
Success rate
30.9%

Pass efficiency edge: 0.354 EPA/play

🛡

Defensive Identity

Coverage-heavy defense suppressing opponents below the national average
EPA/play allowed
-0.051#33 · above avg
Havoc rate (total)
9.0%#136
Front-7 havoc
2.6%
DB havoc
6.4%
Big play rate allowed
1.240#58
Success rate allowed
29.5%

Disruption comes primarily from the secondary.

📊

Season Signature

15.5 PPG offense, 20.5 allowed — -5.0 margin/game
Points per game
15.5
Points allowed/game
20.5
Scoring margin/game
-5.0
Turnover margin
+0won 1 · lost 1
Production returning
21%
Talent rank (247)
#70

1-1 record through 2 games.

Team Shape · percentile vs. FBS · dashed = 50th

OFFENSE12thEXPLOSIVENESS1thFINISHING4thFIELD POS83thDEFENSE77thHAVOC1th50th100th
Offense
12th
Explosiveness
1th
Finishing
4th
Field Pos
83th
Defense
77th
Havoc
1th

Each axis = national percentile rank. 100th = best in FBS, 0th = worst. Defense and Havoc are oriented so higher = better.

CORE efficiency · situation and opponent removed

Points per 100 plays above average, after the game state is regressed out of every snap and the schedule is solved out across the whole league. The version of this team’s efficiency that can be compared to a team it never played.

Overall
-1.1
#74
Offense
-6.3
#115
Defense
-5.2
#40
Full CORE ratings →

What a possession is worth · 12 drives

MeasureOffenseDefense
Points per drive0.251.42
Starting field positionown 25.1own 31.5
Available yards27.2%48.0%
Scoring opportunities66.7%83.3%
Points per opportunity0.381.70
Three-and-out rate41.7%33.3%
Every team’s drive efficiency →

Play-calling identity

Against what the league calls from the same down, distance, field position, score and clock — so this is the staff, not the game script.

Pass rate
56.9%
Expected, given the spots
60.6%
Over expected
-3.7
Fourth down vs peers
-3
Fourth down vs the model
+50
All play-calling tendencies →

National Landscape · 2026 FBS · offense vs. defense EPA/play

Each dot = one FBS team. Tulane is highlighted. Tap or hover a dot for details.

ELITEDEF. FORTRESSOFF. POWERHOUSEREBUILDING-0.100.00+0.10+0.20+0.30-0.050.00+0.10+0.20Offensive EPA/play← worsebetter →Defensive EPA allowed/play← worsebetter →

Similar Programs

Teams with the closest offense + defense efficiency profile to Tulane in 2026

by EPA/play distance
WashingtonSP+ +12.0
Off EPA/play +0.064Def EPA/play -0.019Elo 1762
Match
97%
Sacramento StateSP+ -19.1
Off EPA/play +0.070Def EPA/play -0.015Elo 1476
Match
96%
BaylorSP+ +4.9
Off EPA/play +0.054Def EPA/play +0.028Elo 1506
Match
95%
Florida InternationalSP+ -13.5
Off EPA/play +0.111Def EPA/play -0.063Elo 1385
Match
95%
Utah StateSP+ -11.5
Off EPA/play +0.052Def EPA/play +0.044Elo 1376
Match
94%
UCFSP+ +5.9
Off EPA/play +0.104Def EPA/play -0.106Elo 1465
Match
94%

Similarity = normalized Euclidean distance on season offensive and defensive EPA/play. Teams within ±0.02 EPA/play on both units score >90%.

Program Trajectory · CORE rating · 20152026 · points per game vs an average FBS team

2015: -22.6, #116 of 1282016: -12.3, #100 of 1282017: -8.0, #90 of 1302018: -2.9, #81 of 1302019: +9.7, #32 of 1302020: +2.1, #57 of 1242021: -4.8, #86 of 1302022: +12.7, #23 of 1312023: +1.0, #56 of 1332024: +13.8, #27 of 1342025: +7.0, #47 of 1362026: -1.1, #74 of 138
20152026
Now -1.1 · #74 of 138Best +13.8 in 2024Worst -22.6 in 2015

Program History

recent seasons
YearOverallConfWin %xWLuck
20260-10-0
0%
0.1-0.1
202511-37-1
79%
10.0+1.0
20249-57-2
64%
9.8-0.8
202311-38-1
79%
9.9+1.1
202212-28-1
86%
10.1+1.9
20212-101-7
17%
4.3-2.3
20206-63-5
50%
5.6+0.4
20197-63-5
54%
7.3-0.3
20187-65-3
54%
7.4-0.4
20175-73-5
42%
4.6+0.4

xW = expected wins from per-game dominance. Luck = actual − expected (positive = won close games).

0.6%of 50,000 simulated 2026 seasons end with them in the field

0-1 so far, projected to finish 6.2-5.9. Wins the American Athletic in 5.4%.

If they finish with…

61%
1 loss
11%
2 losses
0.1%
3 losses
0%
4 losses

Their chance of making it at each final loss count. Better than even up to 1.

Win out and it is 61%. One bid goes to the best champion outside the four power leagues, so running the table only enters them into that argument.

down 1.0 points since preseasonlost 3-17 to Duke against an expected margin of 12, so 1.7 against the number.

  • At 1 loss they are 61% where the average American Athletic team is 52%.
  • The American Athletic takes 0.34 bids in an average season.
  • One bid goes to the best champion outside the P4. They take it in 0.6% of seasons, having won their league in 97% of those.

Tulane’s own turning points

Points of playoff probability between winning and losing.

  • wk3at Kansas State2.4
  • wk7vs Memphis1.4
  • wk6at Army1.4
  • wk13at South Florida1.4
  • wk8vs UTSA1.1
  • wk10vs Tulsa1.1

Who to root for

Games Tulane is not in that move its odds most. Same units, much smaller scale.

  • wk9Mississippi State over Texas0.3
  • wk10Texas Tech over West Virginia0.3
  • wk11Middle Tennessee over Liberty0.3
  • wk2Temple over Penn State0.3
  • wk4Virginia over Delaware0.3
  • wk12Michigan State over Oregon0.3
The full playoff picture →

American Athletic

0-0 in league play, projected 4.3-3.78 of 14 by title odds
5.4%
Wins the American Athletic
12%
Reaches the title game

The American Athletic sends its top two by conference winning percentage, head-to-head breaking a tie. The last berth is level on percentage in 33% of simulated seasons, so a tiebreaker decides it about that often.

  • wk7Memphis at Tulane11.0
  • wk13Tulane at South Florida9.4
  • wk8UTSA at Tulane9.3
  • wk6Tulane at Army9.1

Points of title probability riding on each result. The whole American Athletic race →

If not the playoff, then

62%
Bowl eligible
52%
Placed in a bowl
0.6%
In the playoff
48%
Season over in November

Tulane is 0-1 and needs 6 more wins from 11 games to reach the six that make a team eligible — at most one of which may come against an FCS opponent. In 9.5% of seasons they get there and still go nowhere: there are more eligible teams than seats.

  • Armed Forces Bowl9.4%
  • Fenway Bowl8.8%
  • Birmingham Bowl7.2%
  • Gasparilla Bowl6.3%
  • Military Bowl6.2%
  • First Responder Bowl3.9%

Every bowl, and how each one picks →

Recruiting Pipelines

since 2010

Of the 170 high-school programs with a pipeline page here, 6 have sent Tulane a player since 2010 — 28 signees between them. Where they signed, not where they were offered, and not a complete list of Tulane's feeder schools: only these 170 have the outcome history to measure.

High schoolSignedDrafted
St. AugustineLA101
John CurtisLA50
DutchtownGA40
JesuitCA31
HooverAL30
Southern LabLA30
All 170 high-school pipelines →
✓/✗ = whether our pregame model picked the winner. Win % & projections from the Gridpex model. Data: CollegeFootballData.