Skip to content
Will Shipley

#1Will Shipley

RB·Clemson·20222.8 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Will Shipley is a Explosive Back for Clemson. Will's 2022 season ranks in the 35th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 249 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Will Shipley's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2022 Production

Rushing
1182 Rush yards15 Rush TD210 Carries5.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
38 Receptions242 Rec yards0 Rec TD6.4 Yards/rec
Returns
14 Kick returns324 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2022 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency35
  • Volume70
  • Explosiveness52
  • Consistency73
  • Receiving64
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)35th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency73th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.19 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.89 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Louisiana Tech (SP+ -18).

NIL Market Tier· 2022

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8900.89Wk 1 vs Georgia Tech: +0.62 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Furman: +0.28 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.89 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Wake Forest: +0.05 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs NC State: +0.28 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Boston College: +0.12 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Florida State: +0.37 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Syracuse: +0.13 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Notre Dame: +0.21 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Louisville: +0.03 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Miami: +0.04 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs South Carolina: +0.58 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs North Carolina: +0.25 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Tennessee: +0.01 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsGeorgia TechW41-10-11.810424.2211400.62
2vsFurmanW35-1210686.820.28
3vsLouisiana TechW48-20-17.81213911.6221400.89
4@Wake ForestW51-458.2201045.2131500.05
5vsNC StateW30-206.814604.3033700.28
6@Boston CollegeW31-3-14.910333.311800.12
7@Florida StateW34-2813.2201216.1064800.37
8vsSyracuseW27-212.5271726.4231700.13
10@Notre DameL14-3510.312635.3151700.21
11vsLouisvilleW31-169.019975.111-200.03
12vsMiamiW40-10-2.717613.6131400.04
13vsSouth CarolinaL30-3112.7151328.8121300.58
14vsNorth CarolinaW39-107.87182.6142600.25
1vsTennesseeL14-3125.217724.2042100.01

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
24.5%
Passing plays
8.6%
Rushing plays
39.9%
Standard downs
29.5%
Passing downs
12.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.28
Passing downs
-0.01
Pass / Rush EPA
0.25 / 0.24

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.980−0.08
EPA per play · 2022 · 14 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.