Skip to content
Ulysses Bentley IV
Ulysses Bentley IV

#24Ulysses Bentley IV

RB·SMU·20201.4 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Ulysses Bentley IV is a Featured Back for SMU. Ulysses's 2020 season ranks in the 10th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 184 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Ulysses Bentley IV's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2020 Production

Rushing
898 Rush yards11 Rush TD169 Carries5.3 Yards/carry
Receiving
21 Receptions174 Rec yards1 Rec TD8.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2020 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency10
  • Volume75
  • Explosiveness46
  • Consistency38
  • Receiving46
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)10th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency38th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.45 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.48 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Stephen F. Austin.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.4801.48Wk 1 vs Texas State: +0.10 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs North Texas: +0.85 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Stephen F. Austin: +1.48 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Memphis: -0.07 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Tulane: -0.01 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Cincinnati: -0.20 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Navy: +0.47 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Temple: -0.13 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Tulsa: +0.01 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs East Carolina: -0.05 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@Texas StateW31-24-13.411494.521200.10
3@North TexasW65-35-8.01922711.9312100.85
4vsStephen F. AustinW50-758917.821.48
5vsMemphisW30-275.713322.503190-0.07
7@TulaneW37-344.225943.813-10-0.01
8vsCincinnatiL13-4218.616402.503190-0.20
9vsNavyW51-37-9.3251496.0246800.47
10@TempleW47-23-10.017794.60100-0.13
11@TulsaL24-285.6261034.011500.01
13@East CarolinaL38-52-11.012363.004411-0.05

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
26.2%
Passing plays
6.6%
Rushing plays
47.5%
Standard downs
28.9%
Passing downs
20.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.14
Passing downs
0.04
Pass / Rush EPA
0.26 / 0.09

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.650−0.37
EPA per play · 2020 · 10 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.