Skip to content
Tyler Gaffney

#25Tyler Gaffney

RB·Stanford·20132.9 pts line value1st Round

Tyler Gaffney is a Featured Back for Stanford. Tyler's 2013 season ranks in the 50th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 309 plays — a average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Tyler Gaffney's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2013 Production

Rushing
1709 Rush yards21 Rush TD330 Carries5.2 Yards/carry
Receiving
15 Receptions86 Rec yards1 Rec TD5.7 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2013 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency50
  • Volume100
  • Explosiveness44
  • Consistency46
  • Receiving20
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)50th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency46th %ile · average
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.19 EPA/play decline from first to second half.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Donnel PumphreySan Diego State0.3204.2110.1
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.3500.35Wk 2 vs San José State: +0.35 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Army: +0.27 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Arizona State: +0.17 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Washington State: +0.13 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Washington: -0.05 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Utah: +0.28 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs UCLA: +0.22 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Oregon State: +0.17 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Oregon: +0.11 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs USC: -0.01 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs California: -0.20 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Notre Dame: +0.33 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Arizona State: -0.10 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Michigan State: -0.23 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
2vsSan José StateW34-13-5.1201045.2222000.35
3@ArmyW34-20-24.6201326.6112310.27
4vsArizona StateW42-2817.518874.821400.17
5@Washington StateW55-178.214543.901100.13
6vsWashingtonW31-2820.520854.312120-0.05
7@UtahL21-2711.8161086.811300.28
8vsUCLAW24-1020.0361714.821300.22
9@Oregon StateW20-1211.9221456.630.17
11vsOregonW26-2028.7451573.5111500.11
12@USCL17-2022.5241586.62130-0.01
13vsCaliforniaW63-13-8.716955.91100-0.20
14vsNotre DameW27-2013.2331895.711600.33
15@Arizona StateW38-1417.5221336.031-20-0.10
1vsMichigan StateL20-2419.724913.811-20-0.23

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
37.8%
Passing plays
4.2%
Rushing plays
57.2%
Standard downs
44.1%
Passing downs
22.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.09
Passing downs
0.28
Pass / Rush EPA
0.26 / 0.12

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.410−0.29
EPA per play · 2013 · 14 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.