Skip to content
Tahj Brooks

#28Tahj Brooks

RB·Texas Tech·202420233.6 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Tahj Brooks is a 2-year Featured Back for Texas Tech. Tahj's 2023 season ranks in the 28th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 309 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Tahj Brooks's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Rushing
1545 Rush yards10 Rush TD291 Carries5.3 Yards/carry
Receiving
29 Receptions69 Rec yards0 Rec TD2.4 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency28
  • Volume96
  • Explosiveness46
  • Consistency80
  • Receiving34
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)28th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency80th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.25 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.65 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Tarleton State.

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Donnel PumphreySan Diego State0.3204.2110.1
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6500.65Wk 1 vs Wyoming: +0.14 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Oregon: +0.39 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Tarleton State: +0.65 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs West Virginia: +0.37 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Houston: +0.42 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Baylor: +0.37 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Kansas State: +0.27 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs BYU: +0.26 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs TCU: -0.01 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Kansas: +0.01 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs UCF: +0.36 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Texas: +0.07 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@WyomingL33-35-3.611393.5121200.14
2vsOregonL30-3826.266611.0041800.39
3vsTarleton StateW41-3191588.300.65
4@West VirginiaL13-207.5251496.001600.37
5vsHoustonW49-28-7.8221064.821-500.42
6@BaylorW39-14-8.3311705.511400.37
7vsKansas StateL21-3816.217985.8122200.27
8@BYUL14-27-3.3311053.4131500.26
10vsTCUW35-287.9311464.714-40-0.01
11@KansasW16-139.9331334.011600.01
12vsUCFW24-233.4241827.611-400.36
13@TexasL7-5723.219955.004200.07
20vsCaliforniaW34-14-0.122984.515-30

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
33.6%
Passing plays
6.2%
Rushing plays
64.2%
Standard downs
39.8%
Passing downs
19.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.26
Passing downs
0.19
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.17 / 0.29

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.740−0.172024
EPA per play · 2023 — 2024 · 24 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2023Texas Tech
3.6
77.3
2024Texas Tech
3.4
79.8

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.