Skip to content
Mark Weisman

#45Mark Weisman

RB·Iowa·20141.9 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Mark Weisman is a Committee Back for Iowa. Mark's 2014 season ranks in the 5th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 215 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Mark Weisman's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2014 Production

Rushing
812 Rush yards16 Rush TD213 Carries3.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
4 Receptions37 Rec yards0 Rec TD9.3 Yards/rec
Returns
4 Kick returns87 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency5
  • Volume65
  • Explosiveness16
  • Consistency30
  • Receiving12
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)5th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency30th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.27 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.95 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Northern Iowa.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9500.95Wk 1 vs Northern Iowa: +0.95 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Ball State: -0.30 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Iowa State: +0.40 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Pittsburgh: +0.20 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Purdue: +0.06 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Indiana: +0.13 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Maryland: +0.68 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Northwestern: +0.23 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Minnesota: -0.18 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Illinois: -0.04 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Wisconsin: -0.04 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Nebraska: -0.01 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Tennessee: -0.16 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsNorthern IowaW31-2310343.411500.95
2vsBall StateW17-13-6.66132.20-0.30
3vsIowa StateL17-20-7.916493.111800.40
4@PittsburghW24-2014.122884.020.20
5@PurdueW24-10-6.224763.220.06
7vsIndianaW45-291.825893.620.13
8@MarylandL31-385.710787.8211100.68
10vsNorthwesternW48-71.520944.730.23
11@MinnesotaL14-516.814211.51-0.18
12@IllinoisW30-140.4231345.80-0.04
13vsWisconsinL24-2620.812443.701130-0.04
14vsNebraskaL34-3713.124823.40-0.01
1vsTennesseeL28-4512.27101.42-0.16

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
22.7%
Passing plays
1.5%
Rushing plays
42.9%
Standard downs
28.5%
Passing downs
9.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.10
Passing downs
0.45
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.10 / 0.16

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.070−0.43
EPA per play · 2014 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.