Skip to content
Kareem Hunt

#3Kareem Hunt

RB·Toledo·2016201420133.8 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Kareem Hunt is a 3-year Featured Back for Toledo. Kareem's 2014 season ranks in the 63th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 204 plays — a average rate for the RB. Kareem's production has improved each season, a positive development trajectory.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Kareem Hunt's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

Recruiting Profile· Class of 2013

3-Star · Developmental
Stars
247 composite
0.8033
National rank
#1,746
High school
South
Hometown
Willoughby, OH

Recruiting data from CFBD/247Sports composite. Sourced from the player's signing-class team — transfers show original school's class.

2014 Production

Rushing
1631 Rush yards16 Rush TD205 Carries8.0 Yards/carry
Receiving
9 Receptions39 Rec yards0 Rec TD4.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency63
  • Volume80
  • Explosiveness100
  • Consistency86
  • Receiving25
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)63th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency86th %ile · above avg
Career trajectory:↑ Rising
Key findings
  • Career trajectory is upward — WEPA value has improved season over season.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.13 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.82 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Ball State (SP+ -7).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
Nick WilsonArizona0.4105.2102.5
Clyde Edwards-HelaireLSU0.4905.0105.8
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8200.82Wk 1 vs New Hampshire: +0.18 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Missouri: +0.39 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Cincinnati: +0.51 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Ball State: +0.82 EPA/play4Wk 9 vs Massachusetts: +0.26 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Kent State: +0.38 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Northern Illinois: +0.24 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Bowling Green: +0.28 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Eastern Michigan: +0.23 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Arkansas State: +0.38 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsNew HampshireW54-20201366.820.18
2vsMissouriL24-4919.3151489.9331200.39
3@CincinnatiL34-586.9121018.410.51
4vsBall StateW34-23-6.61214211.810.82
9vsMassachusettsW42-35-20.2261987.611-400.26
11@Kent StateW30-20-13.7181417.8021300.38
12@Northern IllinoisL24-27-0.6181196.6011500.24
13vsBowling GreenW27-20-5.4302658.821800.28
14@Eastern MichiganW52-16-25.9221105.010.23
1vsArkansas StateW63-44-0.3322718.551-500.38

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
27.9%
Passing plays
3.8%
Rushing plays
45.7%
Standard downs
32.3%
Passing downs
15.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.39
Passing downs
0.08
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.09 / 0.37

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.790−0.9020142016
EPA per play · 2013 — 2016 · 33 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2013Toledo
2.0
20.0
2014Toledo
3.8
71.8
2016Toledo
2.8
71.6

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.