Skip to content
Kanye Udoh

#6Kanye Udoh

RB·Army·2024

Kanye Udoh is a Explosive Back for Army. Kanye's 2024 season ranks in the 15th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 174 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Kanye Udoh's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Rushing
1117 Rush yards10 Rush TD179 Carries6.2 Yards/carry
Receiving
1 Receptions3 Rec yards0 Rec TD3.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency15
  • Volume65
  • Explosiveness64
  • Consistency38
  • Receiving6
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)15th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency38th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.35 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.12 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Tulsa (SP+ -21).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.1201.12Wk 1 vs Lehigh: +0.45 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Florida Atlantic: -0.11 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Rice: +0.19 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Temple: +0.44 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Tulsa: +1.12 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs UAB: +0.26 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs East Carolina: +0.01 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Air Force: +0.60 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs North Texas: -0.18 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Notre Dame: -0.01 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs UTSA: -0.54 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Tulane: +0.54 EPA/play15Wk 16 vs Navy: -0.16 EPA/play16
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsLehighW42-715755.020.45
2@Florida AtlanticW24-7-12.714705.01-0.11
4vsRiceW37-14-11.48243.000.19
5@TempleW42-14-20.3141289.110.44
6@TulsaW49-7-20.6613722.821301.12
7vsUABW44-10-11.317975.710.26
8vsEast CarolinaW45-28-1.0191025.400.01
10vsAir ForceW20-3-11.7221587.220.60
11@North TexasW14-3-4.513655.00-0.18
13vsNotre DameL14-4923.910353.50-0.01
14vsUTSAW29-242.27152.10-0.54
15vsTulaneW35-145.7201587.910.54
16vsNavyL13-313.514533.80-0.16

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
22.9%
Passing plays
0.8%
Rushing plays
26.7%
Standard downs
27.4%
Passing downs
7.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.24
Passing downs
0.33
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.40 / 0.25

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.