Skip to content
Justin Herbert

#10Justin Herbert

QB·Oregon·201920188.0 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Justin Herbert is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Oregon. Justin's 2019 season ranks in the 63th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 459 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Justin Herbert's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2019 Production

Passing
286/428 Comp/Att3471 Pass yards32 Pass TD6 INT66.8% Comp %
Rushing
50 Rush yards4 Rush TD58 Carries0.9 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2019 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency63
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat83
  • Consistency80
  • Clutch98
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)63th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency80th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.16 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.94 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Nevada (SP+ -12).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9400.94Wk 1 vs Auburn: +0.18 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Nevada: +0.94 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Montana: +0.53 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Stanford: +0.53 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs California: +0.14 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Colorado: +0.40 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Washington: +0.61 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Washington State: +0.18 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs USC: +0.73 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Arizona: +0.63 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Arizona State: +0.20 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Oregon State: +0.04 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Utah: +0.19 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Wisconsin: +0.22 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsAuburnL21-2721.028/372421043.4-1600.18
2vsNevadaW77-6-12.319/263105094.20.94
3vsMontanaW35-330/423165091.41800.53
4@StanfordW21-6-4.719/242593078.5-2200.53
6vsCaliforniaW17-7-2.620/332141149.93200.14
7vsColoradoW45-3-4.118/322612074.3-1200.40
8@WashingtonW35-3118.324/382804080.7400.61
9vsWashington StateW37-3511.121/302220062.6-800.18
10@USCW56-2413.121/2622531810.73
12vsArizonaW34-6-8.020/2833341-1600.63
13@Arizona StateL28-316.320/3630422-900.20
14vsOregon StateW24-10-0.718/30174102200.04
15vsUtahW37-1519.514/26193102000.19
1vsWisconsinW28-2720.314/20138012930.22

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
50.4%
Passing plays
95.9%
Rushing plays
7.2%
Standard downs
42.2%
Passing downs
70.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.24
Passing downs
0.53
Pass / Rush EPA
0.36 / 0.31

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.030−0.092019
EPA per play · 2018 — 2019 · 27 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2018Oregon
8.0
230.1
2019Oregon
8.0
230.0

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.