Skip to content
Jeremy McNichols
Jeremy McNichols

#13Jeremy McNichols

RB·Boise State·201620152.4 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Jeremy McNichols is a 2-year Pass-Catching Back for Boise State. Jeremy's 2015 season ranks in the 20th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 288 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jeremy McNichols's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2015 Production

Rushing
1337 Rush yards20 Rush TD240 Carries5.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
51 Receptions460 Rec yards6 Rec TD9.0 Yards/rec
Returns
5 Kick returns89 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2015 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency20
  • Volume82
  • Explosiveness52
  • Consistency79
  • Receiving70
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)20th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency79th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.58 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Virginia (SP+ 1).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Donnel PumphreySan Diego State0.3204.2110.1
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5800.58Wk 1 vs Washington: +0.18 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs BYU: +0.11 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Idaho State: +0.22 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Virginia: +0.58 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Hawai'i: +0.09 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Colorado State: +0.29 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Wyoming: +0.20 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs UNLV: +0.11 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs New Mexico: +0.05 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Air Force: +0.13 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs San José State: +0.50 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Northern Illinois: +0.45 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsWashingtonW16-139.724893.7232400.18
2@BYUL24-358.715463.1254910.11
3vsIdaho StateW52-015694.630.22
4@VirginiaW56-141.49697.7154710.58
5vsHawai'iW55-0-16.3201085.421-100.09
6@Colorado StateW41-100.5171046.1267700.29
8vsWyomingW34-14-16.7331665.0173610.20
9@UNLVW55-27-16.2221225.5122000.11
11vsNew MexicoL24-31-8.7261284.9185010.05
12vsAir ForceL30-374.7201517.6132200.13
13@San José StateW40-23-4.5201929.6264010.50
1vsNorthern IllinoisW55-7-0.919934.9259610.45

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
28.8%
Passing plays
11.1%
Rushing plays
47.6%
Standard downs
32.9%
Passing downs
19.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.17
Passing downs
0.35
Pass / Rush EPA
0.81 / 0.07

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.990−0.222016
EPA per play · 2015 — 2016 · 25 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2015Boise State
2.4
60.5
2016Boise State
4.7
112.2

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.