Skip to content
Jalen Mickens

#11Jalen Mickens

Jalen Mickens is a Slot Specialist WR for Louisiana Tech.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jalen Mickens's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
20 Receptions177 Rec yards1 Rec TD8.8 Yards/rec

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

12
Targets
11.1y
Avg depth
11.9y
After catch
67%
Catch rate

The ball travels 11.1 yards in the air on an average target 2.2 yards deeper than the median. Another 11.9 comes after the catch.

Where he is targeted

targets · completion rate · yards
deep
1
0% · 0y
1
100% · 67y
0
short
1
100% · 5y
6
67% · 68y
3
67% · 19y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume11
  • Explosiveness12
  • Consistency0
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.16 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 2.71 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs New Mexico State (SP+ -16).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Keytaon ThompsonVirginia0.3200.412.5
Tyler BuchnerNotre Dame0.2500.312.8
Nick NashSan José State0.3100.514.0
Cade HarrisAir Force0.3300.514.8
Ainias SmithTexas A&M0.3100.517.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.7102.71Wk 1 vs SE Louisiana: -0.52 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs New Mexico State: +2.71 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Southern Miss: -0.36 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs UTEP: -0.48 EPA/play5Wk 9 vs Western Kentucky: +0.13 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Sam Houston: -0.20 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Delaware: +0.70 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Washington State: +0.17 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Liberty: -0.27 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Missouri State: +0.30 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsSE LouisianaW24-0122.002-0.52
3vsNew Mexico StateW49-14-15.525628.01402.71
4vsSouthern MissW30-20-7.1144.004-0.36
5@UTEPW30-11-17.5294.507-0.48
9vsWestern KentuckyL27-281.63299.70150.13
10vsSam HoustonW55-14-27.8100.000-0.20
11@DelawareL24-25-10.944210.50220.70
12@Washington StateL3-283.82189.00150.17
13vsLibertyW34-28-9.0284.005-0.27
14@Missouri StateW42-30-10.7294.5050.30

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
4.0%
Passing plays
10.7%
Rushing plays
0.2%
Standard downs
3.3%
Passing downs
5.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.07
Passing downs
0.58
Pass / Rush EPA
0.28 / 0.24

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.