Skip to content
Jake Haener

#9Jake Haener

QB·Fresno State·20218.1 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Jake Haener is a Clutch Passer for Fresno State. Jake's 2021 season ranks in the 33th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 525 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jake Haener's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2021 Production

Passing
329/490 Comp/Att4096 Pass yards33 Pass TD9 INT67.1% Comp %
Rushing
5 Rush yards3 Rush TD71 Carries0.1 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2021 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency33
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat25
  • Consistency77
  • Clutch69
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)33th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency77th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.16 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.26 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Cal Poly.

NIL Market Tier· 2021

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.2601.26Wk 1 vs Oregon: +0.34 EPA/play1Wk 1 vs UConn: +0.34 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Cal Poly: +1.26 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs UCLA: +0.33 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs UNLV: +0.59 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Hawai'i: +0.11 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Wyoming: +0.19 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Nevada: +0.29 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs San Diego State: +0.22 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Boise State: +0.08 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs New Mexico: +0.42 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs San José State: +0.75 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs UTEP: +0.27 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@OregonL24-3110.230/432981062.2-810.34
1vsUConnW45-0-25.620/263313062.0700.34
2vsCal PolyW63-1017/223804096.41121.26
3@UCLAW40-379.439/534552166.2-2700.33
4vsUNLVW38-30-13.830/423785173.21200.59
5@Hawai'iL24-27-2.328/503883456.63600.11
7@WyomingW17-00.615/28962040.31200.19
8vsNevadaW34-323.626/382562064.4-1000.29
9@San Diego StateW30-208.325/423061084.3-1100.22
10vsBoise StateL14-409.422/382792328.3-1600.08
11vsNew MexicoW34-7-18.624/313003071.3-600.42
13@San José StateW40-9-1.927/363434087.6300.75
1vsUTEPW31-24-4.226/412861063.6200.27

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
58.8%
Passing plays
94.9%
Rushing plays
12.1%
Standard downs
52.9%
Passing downs
73.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.31
Passing downs
0.45
Pass / Rush EPA
0.39 / 0.02

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.380−0.04
EPA per play · 2021 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.