Skip to content
Grady O'Neill

#7Grady O'Neill

Grady O'Neill is a Slot Specialist WR for Sam Houston. Grady's 2025 season ranks in the 50th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 54 plays — a average rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Grady O'Neill's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
38 Receptions392 Rec yards1 Rec TD10.3 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns24 KR yards0 KR TD

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

8
Targets
8.9y
Avg depth
3.0y
After catch
88%
Catch rate

The ball travels 8.9 yards in the air on an average target about the median for the position. Another 3.0 comes after the catch.

Where he is targeted

targets · completion rate · yards
deep
0
1
100% · 37y
0
short
0
6
100% · 49y
1
0% · 0y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency50
  • Volume30
  • Explosiveness22
  • Consistency0
  • Pass-Down0
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)50th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.27 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.38 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Middle Tennessee (SP+ -16).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Amare JonesTulane0.1800.012.8
Davis BrysonKennesaw State0.2000.019.4
Hyleck FosterMarshall0.1800.518.2
Brandon ChatmanNavy0.2300.612.0
Eli HeidenreichNavy0.2200.815.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7700.77Wk 2 vs Hawai'i: +0.37 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Texas: -0.77 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs New Mexico State: -0.41 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Jacksonville State: -0.10 EPA/play7Wk 10 vs Louisiana Tech: -0.07 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Oregon State: -0.43 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Delaware: +0.02 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Middle Tennessee: +0.38 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Florida International: +0.32 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
0@Western KentuckyL24-411.635016.7029
2@Hawai'iL20-371.73155.0090.37
4@TexasL0-5516.212222.0022-0.77
6@New Mexico StateL10-37-15.52157.5016-0.41
7vsJacksonville StateL27-29-6.7155.005-0.10
8vsUTEPL17-35-17.52189.0015
10@Louisiana TechL14-55-1.344511.3018-0.07
11@Oregon StateW21-17-15.9166.006-0.43
12vsDelawareW26-23-10.955711.40180.02
13@Middle TennesseeL17-31-16.088911.10200.38
14vsFlorida InternationalL16-56-10.58708.81150.32

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
10.4%
Passing plays
18.5%
Rushing plays
0.4%
Standard downs
7.2%
Passing downs
16.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.28
Passing downs
-0.03
Pass / Rush EPA
0.12 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.