Skip to content
Dillon Gabriel

#8Dillon Gabriel

QB·UCF·202420232020201916.9 pts line value1st Round

Dillon Gabriel is a 4-year Dual-Threat QB for UCF. Dillon's 2020 season ranks in the 88th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 435 plays — a above-average rate for the QB. Dillon's production has improved each season, a positive development trajectory.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Dillon Gabriel's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

Recruiting Profile· Class of 2019

3-Star · Developmental
Stars
247 composite
0.8704
National rank
#754
High school
Mililani
Hometown
Mililani, HI

Recruiting data from CFBD/247Sports composite. Sourced from the player's signing-class team — transfers show original school's class.

2020 Production

Passing
243/406 Comp/Att3517 Pass yards32 Pass TD4 INT59.9% Comp %
Rushing
169 Rush yards2 Rush TD72 Carries2.3 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2020 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency88
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat84
  • Consistency87
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)88th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency87th %ile · above avg
Career trajectory:↑ Rising
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the QB position (88th percentile).
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Career trajectory is upward — WEPA value has improved season over season.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.16 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.67 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Tulane (SP+ 4).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Blake SimsAlabama0.69615.4329.4
C.J. StroudOhio State0.74617.6355.2
Jayden DanielsLSU0.78317.5360.8
Kyle TraskFlorida0.64816.3347.5
Kaidon SalterLiberty0.71114.7345.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6700.67Wk 3 vs Georgia Tech: +0.50 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs East Carolina: +0.64 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Tulsa: +0.25 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Memphis: +0.66 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Tulane: +0.67 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Houston: +0.32 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Temple: +0.66 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Cincinnati: +0.10 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs South Florida: +0.59 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs BYU: +0.26 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
3@Georgia TechW49-21-1.027/41417413000.50
4@East CarolinaW51-28-11.032/4740840100.64
5vsTulsaL26-345.628/51330112800.25
7@MemphisL49-505.731/43548504910.66
8vsTulaneW51-344.226/40422501900.67
9@HoustonW44-213.319/3332820-1100.32
11vsTempleW38-13-10.012/2226820-1000.66
12vsCincinnatiL33-3618.625/48243313000.10
13@South FloridaW58-46-11.422/3633641210.59
1vsBYUL23-4919.221/45217203100.26

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
55.3%
Passing plays
97.9%
Rushing plays
12.1%
Standard downs
47.2%
Passing downs
74.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.28
Passing downs
0.75
Pass / Rush EPA
0.48 / 0.32

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.630−0.27202020232024
EPA per play · 2019 — 2024 · 49 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2019UCF
9.9
260.8
2020UCF
16.9
312.7
2023Oklahoma
16.1
346.4
2024Oregon
11.6
292.9

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.