Skip to content
Daniel Beale

#11Daniel Beale

Daniel Beale is a Dual-Threat QB for Louisiana. Daniel's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 91 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Daniel Beale's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
42/84 Comp/Att385 Pass yards1 Pass TD4 INT50.0% Comp %
Rushing
16 Rush yards0 Rush TD10 Carries1.6 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume92
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency25
  • Clutch96
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency25th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5600.56Wk 1 vs Rice: -0.45 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs McNeese: +0.01 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Missouri: -0.56 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Eastern Michigan: +0.27 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Marshall: +0.10 EPA/play5
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsRiceL12-14-14.80/60006.2-0.45
2vsMcNeeseW34-1014/22861031.21800.01
3@MissouriL10-5214.41/85004.8-140-0.56
4@Eastern MichiganL31-34-14.720/332220223.5700.27
5vsMarshallW54-51-4.57/1572023.4500.10

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
32.1%
Passing plays
67.4%
Rushing plays
3.2%
Standard downs
26.6%
Passing downs
43.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.09
Passing downs
0.19
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.00 / 0.67

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.