Skip to content
Dak Prescott

#15Dak Prescott

QB·Mississippi State·20152014201310.9 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Dak Prescott is a 3-year Dual-Threat QB for Mississippi State. Dak's 2014 season ranks in the 48th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 594 plays — a average rate for the QB. Dak's production has improved each season, a positive development trajectory.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Dak Prescott's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2014 Production

Passing
244/396 Comp/Att3449 Pass yards27 Pass TD11 INT61.6% Comp %
Rushing
986 Rush yards14 Rush TD210 Carries4.7 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency48
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat84
  • Consistency84
  • Clutch64
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)48th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency84th %ile · above avg
Career trajectory:↑ Rising
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Career trajectory is upward — WEPA value has improved season over season.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Peak game: 0.69 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs South Alabama (SP+ -4).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3
Casey ThompsonNebraska0.52812.6351.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6900.69Wk 1 vs Southern Miss: +0.32 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs UAB: +0.40 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs South Alabama: +0.69 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs LSU: +0.04 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Texas A&M: +0.45 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Auburn: +0.26 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Kentucky: +0.24 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Arkansas: +0.41 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs UT Martin: +0.58 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Alabama: +0.16 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Vanderbilt: +0.69 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Ole Miss: +0.14 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Georgia Tech: +0.31 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsSouthern MissW49-0-15.918/262844159.72300.32
2vsUABW47-34-4.212/252114186.611110.40
3@South AlabamaW35-3-4.313/212011094.513910.69
4@LSUW34-2921.515/242682078.310510.04
6vsTexas A&MW48-3120.220/262682087.37730.45
7vsAuburnW38-2324.218/342461262.112120.26
9@KentuckyW45-316.618/332161164.18820.24
10vsArkansasW17-1012.218/273311268.26100.41
11vsUT MartinW45-1614/232062094.65410.58
12@AlabamaL20-2534.327/482902330.98200.16
13vsVanderbiltW51-0-4.316/211933091.53010.69
14@Ole MissL17-3120.722/372821029.04810.14
1vsGeorgia TechL34-4911.233/514533155.94710.31

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
60.9%
Passing plays
95.7%
Rushing plays
34.4%
Standard downs
56.7%
Passing downs
72.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.28
Passing downs
0.40
Pass / Rush EPA
0.32 / 0.32

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.230−0.2320142015
EPA per play · 2013 — 2015 · 37 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2013Mississippi State
2.1
82.6
2014Mississippi State
10.9
289.9
2015Mississippi State
13.6
336.6

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.