Skip to content
D'Wayne' Winfield
D'Wayne' Winfield

D'Wayne' Winfield

D'Wayne' Winfield is a Dual-Threat QB for Louisiana. D'Wayne''s 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 340 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So D'Wayne' Winfield's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
127/216 Comp/Att1555 Pass yards11 Pass TD7 INT58.8% Comp %
Rushing
667 Rush yards9 Rush TD152 Carries4.4 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

42
Attempts
6.1y
Avg depth
7.8y
After catch
76%
Catch rate

The ball travels 6.1 yards in the air on an average throw 2.4 yards shorter than the median. Another 7.8 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
1
0% · 0y
0
2
50% · 38y
short
14
93% · 163y
6
83% · 91y
19
68% · 109y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat71
  • Consistency0
  • Clutch88
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.27 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.81 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Marshall (SP+ -5).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8100.81Wk 2 vs McNeese: -0.74 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Missouri: -0.18 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Eastern Michigan: -0.22 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Marshall: +0.81 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs James Madison: +0.15 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Southern Miss: +0.14 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Troy: +0.34 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs South Alabama: +0.48 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Texas State: +0.22 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Arkansas State: +0.36 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs UL Monroe: -0.08 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
2vsMcNeeseW34-1020-0.74
3@MissouriL10-5214.41/6-10038.1130-0.18
4@Eastern MichiganL31-34-14.71/250011.140-0.22
5vsMarshallW54-51-4.57/131252097.412930.81
7@James MadisonL14-2412.314/282432153.62300.15
8vsSouthern MissL10-22-7.112/211120117.19810.14
9@TroyL23-35-4.812/221871265.413900.34
10@South AlabamaW31-22-12.714/152322089.14510.48
11vsTexas StateW42-392.317/271923261.24920.22
13@Arkansas StateW34-30-8.818/251470045.88920.36
14vsUL MonroeW30-27-21.610/21820023.2360-0.08
20vsDelawareL13-20-10.921/362311137.6400

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
43.8%
Passing plays
67.9%
Rushing plays
27.6%
Standard downs
39.3%
Passing downs
52.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.14
Passing downs
0.38
Pass / Rush EPA
0.25 / 0.25

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.