Skip to content
Chase Brice

#7Chase Brice

QB·App State·202115.3 pts line value1st Round

Chase Brice is a Dual-Threat QB for App State. Chase's 2021 season ranks in the 50th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 434 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Chase Brice's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2021 Production

Passing
242/390 Comp/Att3337 Pass yards27 Pass TD11 INT62.1% Comp %
Rushing
149 Rush yards3 Rush TD71 Carries2.1 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2021 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency50
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat82
  • Consistency86
  • Clutch28
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)50th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency86th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Peak game: 0.74 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs Troy (SP+ -7).

NIL Market Tier· 2021

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Blake SimsAlabama0.69615.4329.4
Malik CunninghamLouisville0.68114.7341.6
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5
Kaidon SalterLiberty0.71114.7345.6
Dillon GabrielOklahoma0.73216.1346.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7400.74Wk 1 vs East Carolina: +0.40 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Miami: +0.37 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Elon: +0.65 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Marshall: +0.26 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Georgia State: +0.73 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Louisiana: +0.06 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Coastal Carolina: +0.64 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs UL Monroe: +0.45 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Arkansas State: +0.23 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs South Alabama: +0.36 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Troy: +0.74 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Georgia Southern: +0.42 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Louisiana: +0.17 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Western Kentucky: +0.55 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsEast CarolinaW33-190.520/272592175.8100.40
2@MiamiL23-2510.821/341991155.3700.37
3vsElonW44-1019/252931071.81010.65
4vsMarshallW31-308.024/392831175.92200.26
5@Georgia StateW45-161.820/283263076.5-1300.73
7@LouisianaL13-418.715/261330234.61110.06
8vsCoastal CarolinaW30-2713.218/283472091.43400.64
9vsUL MonroeW59-28-20.320/302564060.9700.45
10@Arkansas StateW48-14-17.915/261631142.11400.23
11vsSouth AlabamaW31-7-7.214/261952265.31710.36
12@TroyW45-7-6.517/242123282.62000.74
13vsGeorgia SouthernW27-3-15.312/242352052.9-900.42
14@LouisianaL16-248.712/301191051.55300.17
1vsWestern KentuckyL38-5913.315/233174175.2-2500.55

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
46.6%
Passing plays
93.6%
Rushing plays
9.8%
Standard downs
41.7%
Passing downs
57.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.46
Passing downs
0.40
Pass / Rush EPA
0.45 / 0.31

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.810−0.01
EPA per play · 2021 · 14 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.