Skip to content
Chandler Morris

#4Chandler Morris

Chandler Morris is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for TCU. Chandler's 2023 season ranks in the 28th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 209 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Chandler Morris's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Passing
132/202 Comp/Att1528 Pass yards12 Pass TD5 INT65.3% Comp %
Rushing
249 Rush yards3 Rush TD45 Carries5.5 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency28
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency69
  • Clutch92
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)28th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency69th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.40 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.85 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Nicholls.

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8500.85Wk 1 vs Colorado: +0.37 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Nicholls: +0.85 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Houston: +0.37 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs SMU: +0.64 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs West Virginia: +0.49 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Iowa State: +0.38 EPA/play6Wk 12 vs Baylor: -0.49 EPA/play12
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsColoradoL42-45-4.924/422792262.93010.37
2vsNichollsW41-626/302632092.66310.85
3@HoustonW36-13-7.824/373142166.65300.37
4vsSMUW34-1710.123/322613089.83800.64
5vsWest VirginiaL21-247.523/412982083.45110.49
6@Iowa StateL14-277.510/16941223.01400.38
12vsBaylorW42-17-8.32/4190011.5-0.49

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
45.0%
Passing plays
77.8%
Rushing plays
12.9%
Standard downs
38.6%
Passing downs
59.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.40
Passing downs
0.66
Pass / Rush EPA
0.45 / 0.82

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.020−0.232025
EPA per play · 2024 — 2025 · 26 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2024North Texas
6.2
219.0
2025Virginia
4.7
162.7

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.