Skip to content
Chandler Morris

#4Chandler Morris

QB·Virginia·202520244.7 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Chandler Morris is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Virginia. Chandler's 2025 season ranks in the 18th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 486 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Chandler Morris's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
282/436 Comp/Att3000 Pass yards16 Pass TD9 INT64.7% Comp %
Rushing
245 Rush yards5 Rush TD64 Carries3.8 Yards/carry
Punting
1 Punts41 Punt yards41.0 Yards/punt41 Long1 Inside 20

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency18
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency70
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)18th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency70th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.24 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.78 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Stanford (SP+ -12).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7800.78Wk 1 vs Coastal Carolina: +0.72 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs NC State: +0.28 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs William & Mary: +0.41 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Stanford: +0.78 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Florida State: +0.57 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Louisville: -0.12 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Washington State: +0.10 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs North Carolina: -0.12 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs California: +0.33 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Wake Forest: -0.04 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Duke: +0.40 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Virginia Tech: +0.26 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Duke: +0.09 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsCoastal CarolinaW48-7-15.119/272642067.35000.72
2@NC StateL31-354.830/432571180.65600.28
3vsWilliam & MaryW55-1613/191491034.4700.41
4vsStanfordW48-20-11.823/313804096.21910.78
5vsFlorida StateW46-387.226/352292392.63730.57
6@LouisvilleW30-2712.419/311491050.270-0.12
8vsWashington StateW22-203.815/251790035.81500.10
9@North CarolinaW17-16-6.620/352001114.6-210-0.12
10@CaliforniaW31-21-3.224/362620073.23800.33
11vsWake ForestL9-165.73/6190023.360-0.04
12@DukeW34-176.623/353162284.7900.40
14vsVirginia TechW27-7-10.121/351820075.22510.26
15vsDukeL20-276.621/402162228.6-300.09
20vsMissouriW13-714.425/381980078.200

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
47.1%
Passing plays
88.6%
Rushing plays
9.2%
Standard downs
40.2%
Passing downs
61.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.09
Passing downs
0.53
Pass / Rush EPA
0.26 / 0.67

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.020−0.232025
EPA per play · 2024 — 2025 · 26 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2024North Texas
6.2
219.0
2025Virginia
4.7
162.7

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.