#18Chandler Fields

QB·Louisiana·2024

Chandler Fields is a Dual-Threat QB for Louisiana. Chandler's 2024 season ranks in the 88th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 96 plays — a above-average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.46
Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
Total EPA (value)0.51
Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Chandler Fields's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Passing

63/87 Comp/Att897 Pass yards5 Pass TD1 INT72.4% Comp %

Rushing

88 Rush yards2 Rush TD26 Carries3.4 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs QB peers

Efficiency88
Volume73
Dual-Threat64
Consistency90
Clutch86

Player type

Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)88th %ile · above avg

Game-to-game consistency90th %ile · elite

Key findings

▸Above-average efficiency for the QB position (88th percentile).
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Peak game: 0.79 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs South Alabama (SP+ 3).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗

Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	C/ATT	Pass Yds	Pass TD	INT	QBR	Rush Yds	Rush TD	EPA/play
1	vsGrambling	W40-10	—	4/5	55	0	0	45.7	2	0	0.33
2	@Kennesaw State	W34-10	-25.1	2/2	8	0	0	99.4	9	0	0.48
11	vsArkansas State	W55-19	-9.9	4/5	34	0	0	99.1	12	1	0.66
12	vsSouth Alabama	L22-24	2.8	14/17	185	1	0	87.9	28	1	0.79
13	vsTroy	W51-30	-6.6	18/24	323	2	0	75.1	26	0	0.70
14	@UL Monroe	W37-23	-16.7	17/26	188	2	1	67.8	-3	0	0.24
15	vsMarshall	L3-31	3.1	4/8	104	0	0	76.3	14	0	0.65

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

25.7%

Passing plays

42.6%

Rushing plays

9.9%

Standard downs

21.2%

Passing downs

37.2%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.47
Passing downs: 0.70
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.65 / 0.22

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).