Skip to content
Carson Strong

#12Carson Strong

QB·Nevada·2021202010.7 pts line value

Carson Strong is a 2-year Clutch Passer for Nevada. Carson's 2021 season ranks in the 65th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 555 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Carson Strong's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2021 Production

Passing
367/524 Comp/Att4186 Pass yards36 Pass TD8 INT70.0% Comp %
Rushing
-208 Rush yards0 Rush TD51 Carries-4.1 Yards/carry
Punting
3 Punts104 Punt yards34.7 Yards/punt38 Long1 Inside 20

Performance Analysis · 2021 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency65
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat0
  • Consistency85
  • Clutch100
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)65th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency85th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.80 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs New Mexico State (SP+ -24).

NIL Market Tier· 2021

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0
Ryan HigginsLouisiana Tech0.58613.7334.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8000.80Wk 1 vs California: +0.41 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Idaho State: +0.51 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Kansas State: +0.14 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Boise State: +0.28 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs New Mexico State: +0.80 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Hawai'i: +0.34 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Fresno State: +0.30 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs UNLV: +0.65 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs San José State: +0.15 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs San Diego State: +0.35 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Air Force: +0.35 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Colorado State: +0.79 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@CaliforniaW22-173.422/393122164.3-700.41
2vsIdaho StateW49-1034/433814064.5400.51
3@Kansas StateL17-3814.227/402621153.8-1400.14
5@Boise StateW41-319.425/382631076.8-2000.28
6vsNew Mexico StateW55-28-24.225/323776143.6-1100.80
7vsHawai'iW34-17-2.334/543952074.6-3200.34
8@Fresno StateL32-3410.849/614764175.9-2100.30
9vsUNLVW51-20-13.837/494174180.6400.65
10vsSan José StateW27-24-1.936/543141225.9-2600.15
11@San Diego StateL21-238.334/483503072.9-2300.35
12vsAir ForceL39-417.427/443514150.9-5100.35
13@Colorado StateW52-10-2.417/222884092.8-1100.79

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
66.5%
Passing plays
95.4%
Rushing plays
5.7%
Standard downs
60.2%
Passing downs
79.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.25
Passing downs
0.59
Pass / Rush EPA
0.41 / -0.30

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.87+0.042021
EPA per play · 2020 — 2021 · 21 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2020Nevada
10.3
204.4
2021Nevada
10.7
298.5

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.