Skip to content

Nevada Wolf Pack

Mountain West·1-0·
Elo
1462#76
SP+
-6.1#87
FPI
-3.1
AP
NR
Nextvs Montana State · Wk 2
Talent #118 (550.0)Recruiting class #9836% production returning

Team Leaders

Latest on Nevada

All news

Carter Jones produced four of Nevada's eight explosive plays

Matchup · 6d ago

Four Points Apart at Mackay Stadium, on a Projection With Zero 2026 Games

Matchup · Aug 31

Roster · 103 players

FR 42SO 19JR 20SR 22
#PlayerPosClHtWt
5Reeve SloneQBFR6'0"200
6Carter JonesQBSO6'3"197
10AJ BiancoQBSR6'3"217
12Luke DuncanQBJR6'6"210
0Dominic KelleyRBSO6'0"215
1Herschel TurnerRBJR5'9"196
2Janerious JacksonRBJR6'1"220
4Carter JacksonRBFR5'9"190
24Bronwyn RiosRBFR5'9"205
25Ky WoodsRBSR5'9"173
26Mekai SmithRBFR6'0"220
3Jaceon DossWRSR6'0"170
5Donnie CheersWRJR6'0"180
7Gary Givens IIIWRJR6'1"200
8Daijon CalimonWRSO6'2"190
9Marshaun BrownWRJR6'4"198
11Damien MorganWRSR5'10"181
13Isaiah WilliamsWRFR5'11"175
14Gerick RobinsonWRSR5'7"178
18Don HenryWRJR6'1"190
19Mack KumpWRFR5'9"183
30Alex GrushWRFR6'1"175
84Deven VigueWRFR6'0"170
86Joe StimpsonWRFR5'10"180
87Amari NashWRFR6'0"175
88Perrion WilliamsWRFR6'0"175
16DJ AsiasiTEFR6'2"248
19Kola BabalolaTESR6'2"215
80Darren SchmittTEFR6'4"230
81Trace EstesTESO6'4"220
82Jayden O'RourkeTESR6'9"262
83Carter EckTESO6'2"245
89Benjamin WheelerTEJR6'2"224
52Elias JusticeOLJR6'3"315
55Jack FosterOLSR6'6"298
56Max ZuroOLFR6'4"300
58Ethan LowellOLSO6'3"282
59Jacob NorcrossOLJR6'2"300
61Terrence JohnsonOLFR6'4"300
64Jackson RamseyOLFR6'3"305
65Colton HoggeOLFR6'4"280
66Henry SellardsOLSO6'4"300
68Mataio AionoOLFR6'3"280
70Snoop Leota-AmaamaOLSR6'4"331
71Colin BanningOLFR6'2"304
72Ethan NewmanOLJR6'3"300
73Tyler MillerOLSO6'2"302
75Jose Balver-MendozaOLSO6'5"287
76Zach CochnauerOLSR6'5"306
3Kameron BrownEDGEFR6'2"249
4Brandon AmaniampongEDGEJR6'6"250
9Jack MacKinnonEDGEJR6'4"239
32Dylan LaBarberaEDGESR6'1"248
37Matt PerezEDGEFR6'3"250
46Tanner GrayEDGEFR6'2"240
88Keegan PereaEDGEFR6'1"255
92Myles WilliamsEDGESR6'3"242
93Craig StatlerEDGEFR6'3"240
94Sam Davidson IVEDGEFR6'5"260
95Chris KaluEDGESO6'3"250
10Logologo Va'aDLSR6'3"329
90Jason Hemphill IIDLFR5'11"300
96Tanner VaughanDLSR6'3"270
98David Paine Jr.DLSO6'1"273
99Jakobus SethDLSR6'3"291
91James GillespieDTSR6'3"315
97Jeremiah FoniDTJR6'1"290
1Jeremy Naborne-OwensLBSR6'2"220
2EJ SmithLBSR6'0"243
11Poasa UtuLBJR6'0"230
14Jaxon CannidaLBFR6'3"219
19CJ MooringLBFR6'0"215
20Cody WellsLBFR6'2"210
30Jake SilvermanLBSO6'0"215
36Isaiah ReedLBFR6'1"218
42Colson KermodeLBFR6'1"212
44Alosio MaluiaLBSO6'1"220
35Zion JonesCBSO6'2"163
0Joshua ScottDBSR6'2"185
5Zion JonesDBJR6'2"163
6Cooper WilsonDBJR6'2"186
7Selman BridgesDBSO6'4"181
8Larry Turner-GoodenDBSR5'11"190
12Bryson SnellingDBJR6'2"190
13Tajean StallworthDBFR6'0"164
15Bishop TurnerDBJR5'10"188
16Brock WattenbargerDBSO5'11"180
17Zavien AbercrombieDBSO5'9"166
18Aiden WalkerDBSO5'11"185
22Jaylen WebbDBJR6'2"196
24Justin Wyatt Jr.DBFR6'2"169
25Joey Thomas IIIDBFR6'1"170
26Isaiah JordanDBFR6'0"200
28Mykel FordDBFR5'10"168
29Dorsey SandersDBSR6'1"195
31Coy JonesDBFR5'10"175
33Michael HuntDBFR6'0"175
34Cutter VorheesDBFR6'2"190
84Joe McFaddenPKSR5'9"180
98Kyle NelsonPKFR5'11"170
99Jacob FernandezPKFR6'6"215
95Ewan BaulchPFR6'3"215
51Cian StackLSSO6'0"240

Team Statistics · per game, with national FBS rank

Points / game
49.0
scoring offense
Points allowed
14.0
scoring defense
Differential
+35.0
per game
Offense
Total yards / game
486.0#34
Yards / play
8.4#13
Passing yards / game
163.0#115
Rushing yards / game
323.0#6
First downs / game
20.0#78
3rd down %
50.0%#35
4th down %
100.0%#1
Time of possession
27:27#107
Defense
Yards allowed / game
367.0#88
Yards / play allowed
4.5#55
Pass yards allowed / game
203.0#70
Rush yards allowed / game
164.0#107
3rd down % allowed
35.3%#71
Sacks
3#58
Tackles for loss
6#91
Turnovers & Discipline
Turnover margin
+1#36
Takeaways
2#53
Giveaways
1#31
Penalties / game
4.0#19
Penalty yards / game
40.0#39

Rank is national among all FBS teams (#1 = best), oriented so higher rank = better even for defensive and discipline metrics. Bars show percentile.

Scouting Report · 2026 projection

Nevada is in year 3 under Jeff Choate. The strengths are defensive, led by 34th at keeping everything in front of them. The way in is 131st at turning trips inside the 40 into points, and they are 129th at throwing it.

Nevada has played 1 game against an average slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 0% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.

Projected strengths

  • Defensehitting chunk plays
    #34
    projected

Projected soft spots

  • Offenseturning trips inside the 40 into points
    #131
    projected
  • Offensethrowing it
    #129
    projected
  • Offensesurviving second and twelve
    #128
    projected

Each bar is where this team sits in the country. Before the season has produced enough football these are PROJECTIONS — last season regressed to the mean, plus talent, returning production, recruiting and whether the staff is the same one — and the season replaces them as it is played. Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.

2026 Season Projection

model win prob · 10 to play
5.06.0
projected final record (now 10)
Exp. wins left
4.0
of 10 games
Bowl odds
36%
reach 6 wins
Best odds
94%
vs San José State
Toughest
9%
vs UCLA

How the season could finish · 2026 · chance of each final win total · 10 games left

Every remaining game simulated from the model's win probability for it. Tallest bar is the single likeliest finish, not a prediction that it happens.

1234567891011
final winstallest bar = 29% chance
Likeliest finish 5-6 (29%)Bowl eligible 36% · marked on the axis at 6

Player Value

EPA contribution by position group + estimated NIL market value (derived from position rates and on-field production — not actual deal figures).

Unit Value — Total EPA
RBKy Woods, Carter Jackson +2
+12.5 EPA
QBCarter Jones
+11.0 EPA
WRMarshaun Brown, Donnie Cheers +1
+10.0 EPA
TEDJ Asiasi
+2.7 EPA

Total EPA produced by each positional group this season. OL value is captured via the rush/pass efficiency of skill players; OL-specific EPA isn't separately reported.

The Five Factors

ranked vs. FBS · bar = better
Efficiency (PPA)
Off0.6496th#7
Def-0.0069th#44
Explosiveness
Off1.8199th#3
Def0.8899th#3
Field position
Off72.570th#42
Def76.117th#115
Finishing (pts/opp)
Off6.0093rd#11
Def2.8066th#48
Turnovers
Won 2Lost 1
Margin +1

Opponent-adjusted efficiency

EPA/play vs. schedule
Offense
Defense
Off · pass
0.4566th#47
Off · rush
0.7197th#5

Pass vs. rush (PPA)

Rushing
Off0.7197th#5
Def-0.1984th#23
Passing
Off0.4564th#50
Def0.1460th#56

Trenches & disruption

Line yards (off)
4.19#11
2nd-level / open-field
1.89 / 4.56
Power / stuff (off)
100.0% / 11.1%
Havoc — total (def)
11.9%#113
Havoc — front 7 / DB
9.5% / 2.4%

Standard vs. passing downs

Pro
Std downs
Off0.52
Def-0.06
Pass downs
Off0.95
Def0.08

PPA on each down type (off vs. def).

Opponent-adjusted by down

Pro
1st2nd3rd
Offense0.46#110.76#80.88#27
Defense0.03#89-0.15#270.11#28

Elo Trajectory

Western KentuckyFinal
Elo rating 13511462+111 over season

Team Fingerprint · 2026 · 43 opponent-adjusted metrics · percentile vs 138 FBS teams

Plot these →
worst in FBSbest

Efficiency

  • Offense EPA/play0.5689th
  • Defense EPA/play allowed0.0750th
  • Offense success rate51%66th
  • Defense success rate allowed44%26th

Downs

  • Offense success — standard downs51%52nd
  • Offense success — passing downs50%88th
  • Defense success allowed — standard downs51%23rd
  • Defense success allowed — passing downs32%36th

Explosiveness

  • Offense explosiveness1.697th
  • Defense explosiveness allowed0.9092nd
  • Offense explosiveness — standard downs1.599th
  • Offense explosiveness — passing downs2.055th

Trenches

  • Offense line yards3.575th
  • Defense line yards allowed3.034th
  • Offense highlight yards3.193rd
  • Defense highlight yards allowed0.7647th
  • Offense power success0.8673rd
  • Defense power success allowed0.6761st
  • Offense stuff rate0.1934th
  • Defense stuff rate0.2047th

Third down

  • Third down conversion50%66th
  • Third down distance faced6.750th
  • Third down conversion allowed38%47th
  • Third down distance forced8.372nd

Halves

  • Net success rate — first half0.0340th
  • Net success rate — second half0.1157th

Drives

  • Points per drive4.591st
  • Points per drive allowed1.374th
  • Average starting field position3486th
  • Opponent starting field position2480th
  • Available yards gained69%84th
  • Available yards allowed40%75th
  • Scoring opportunities per drive91%75th
  • Scoring opportunities allowed55%91st
  • Points per scoring opportunity4.990th
  • Points allowed per opportunity2.362nd
  • Three-and-out rate18%73rd
  • Three-and-outs forced36%76th

Roster

  • Returning usage44%51st
  • Returning EPA32.315th
  • Team talent composite55015th
  • Recruiting class rank98.029th
  • Recruiting class points17729th

Every metric is opponent-adjusted and ranked so that higher is always better — a defensive rate that is good when low is ranked accordingly. Sack and tackle-for-loss composition are deliberately absent: their relationship to team quality is a measured null, so they carry a style rather than a rank, and they appear in the pressure signature instead.

Intelligence Report

Offensive DNA

Run-first attack — top 5 nationally by EPA/play
EPA/play
+0.637#7 · elite
Pass EPA/play
+0.446#50
Rush EPA/play
+0.707#5
Explosiveness
1.808#3
Pts/opportunity
6.00#11
Success rate
52.3%

Rush efficiency edge: 0.261 EPA/play

🛡

Defensive Identity

EPA/play allowed
-0.000#44 · above avg
Havoc rate (total)
11.9%#113
Front-7 havoc
9.5%
DB havoc
2.4%
Big play rate allowed
0.884#3
Success rate allowed
41.4%

Disruption comes primarily from the front seven.

📊

Season Signature

49.0 PPG offense, 14.0 allowed — +35.0 margin/game
Points per game
49.0
Points allowed/game
14.0
Scoring margin/game
+35.0
Turnover margin
+1won 2 · lost 1
Production returning
36%
Talent rank (247)
#118

1-0 record through 1 games.

Team Shape · percentile vs. FBS · dashed = 50th

OFFENSE96thEXPLOSIVENESS99thFINISHING93thFIELD POS70thDEFENSE69thHAVOC18th50th100th
Offense
96th
Explosiveness
99th
Finishing
93th
Field Pos
70th
Defense
69th
Havoc
18th

Each axis = national percentile rank. 100th = best in FBS, 0th = worst. Defense and Havoc are oriented so higher = better.

CORE efficiency · situation and opponent removed

Points per 100 plays above average, after the game state is regressed out of every snap and the schedule is solved out across the whole league. The version of this team’s efficiency that can be compared to a team it never played.

Overall
+2.9
#60
Offense
+2.4
#50
Defense
-0.6
#68
Full CORE ratings →

What a possession is worth · 11 drives

MeasureOffenseDefense
Points per drive4.461.27
Starting field positionown 33.5own 23.8
Available yards68.6%39.6%
Scoring opportunities90.9%54.5%
Points per opportunity4.902.33
Three-and-out rate18.2%36.4%
Every team’s drive efficiency →

Play-calling identity

Against what the league calls from the same down, distance, field position, score and clock — so this is the staff, not the game script.

Pass rate
37.5%
Expected, given the spots
46.1%
Over expected
-8.6
Fourth down vs peers
-3
Fourth down vs the model
-100
All play-calling tendencies →

National Landscape · 2026 FBS · offense vs. defense EPA/play

Each dot = one FBS team. Nevada is highlighted. Tap or hover a dot for details.

ELITEDEF. FORTRESSOFF. POWERHOUSEREBUILDING-0.100.00+0.10+0.20+0.30-0.050.00+0.10+0.20Offensive EPA/play← worsebetter →Defensive EPA allowed/play← worsebetter →

Similar Programs

Teams with the closest offense + defense efficiency profile to Nevada in 2026

by EPA/play distance
IndianaSP+ +24.1
Off EPA/play +0.656Def EPA/play +0.010Elo 2113
Match
99%
FloridaSP+ +18.6
Off EPA/play +0.611Def EPA/play -0.073Elo 1658
Match
96%
SMUSP+ +11.1
Off EPA/play +0.557Def EPA/play +0.037Elo 1728
Match
96%
South CarolinaSP+ +16.7
Off EPA/play +0.742Def EPA/play +0.045Elo 1742
Match
94%
BYUSP+ +16.8
Off EPA/play +0.520Def EPA/play +0.039Elo 1666
Match
94%
Mississippi StateSP+ +9.4
Off EPA/play +0.586Def EPA/play -0.125Elo 1584
Match
93%

Similarity = normalized Euclidean distance on season offensive and defensive EPA/play. Teams within ±0.02 EPA/play on both units score >90%.

Program Trajectory · CORE rating · 20152026 · points per game vs an average FBS team

2015: -12.2, #98 of 1282016: -17.1, #111 of 1282017: -15.6, #108 of 1302018: -3.5, #86 of 1302019: -14.4, #109 of 1302020: +9.2, #32 of 1242021: +1.4, #69 of 1302022: -19.9, #123 of 1312023: -25.9, #132 of 1332024: -5.2, #87 of 1342025: -15.3, #110 of 1362026: +2.9, #60 of 138
20152026
Now +2.9 · #60 of 138Best +9.2 in 2020Worst -25.9 in 2023

Program History

recent seasons
YearOverallConfWin %xWLuck
20261-00-0
100%
1.0+0.0
20253-92-6
25%
3.7-0.7
20243-100-7
23%
5.6-2.6
20232-102-6
17%
2.5-0.5
20222-100-8
17%
3.0-1.0
20218-55-3
62%
6.5+1.5
20207-26-2
78%
5.0+2.0
20197-64-4
54%
6.3+0.7
20188-55-3
62%
6.5+1.5
20173-93-5
25%
4.5-1.5

xW = expected wins from per-game dominance. Luck = actual − expected (positive = won close games).

2.8%of 50,000 simulated 2026 seasons end with them in the field

1-0 so far, projected to finish 8.1-4.2. Wins the Mountain West in 11%.

If they finish with…

92%
0 losses
45%
1 loss
3.0%
2 losses
0%
3 losses
0%
4 losses

Their chance of making it at each final loss count. Better than even up to 0.

Win out and it is 92%. One bid goes to the best champion outside the four power leagues, so running the table only enters them into that argument.

up 2.3 points since preseasonwon 49-14 over Western Kentucky against an expected margin of 2, so +37.0 against the number.

  • At 1 loss they are 45% where the average Mountain West team is 51%.
  • The Mountain West takes 0.23 bids in an average season.
  • One bid goes to the best champion outside the P4. They take it in 2.7% of seasons, having won their league in 93% of those.

Nevada’s own turning points

Points of playoff probability between winning and losing.

  • wk9at UCLA9.4
  • wk13at UNLV8.2
  • wk10vs New Mexico6.1
  • wk4vs Air Force4.8
  • wk12vs Hawai'i4.1
  • wk8vs San José State3.7

Who to root for

Games Nevada is not in that move its odds most. Same units, much smaller scale.

  • wk2North Dakota State over Air Force1.2
  • wk9Northern Illinois over UNLV0.8
  • wk6Western Michigan over Kent State0.7
  • wk9Notre Dame over Navy0.7
  • wk11San José State over Air Force0.6
  • wk8Washington State over Boise State0.6
The full playoff picture →

Mountain West

0-0 in league play, projected 4.9-3.14 of 10 by title odds
11%
Wins the Mountain West
27%
Reaches the title game

The Mountain West sends its top two by conference winning percentage, head-to-head breaking a tie. The last berth is level on percentage in 35% of simulated seasons, so a tiebreaker decides it about that often.

  • wk13Nevada at UNLV22.8
  • wk10New Mexico at Nevada19.3
  • wk4Air Force at Nevada15.0
  • wk12Hawai'i at Nevada12.8

Points of title probability riding on each result. The whole Mountain West race →

If not the playoff, then

90%
Bowl eligible
86%
Placed in a bowl
2.8%
In the playoff
11%
Season over in November

Nevada is 1-0 and needs 5 more wins from 11 games to reach the six that make a team eligible — at most one of which may come against an FCS opponent. In 1.7% of seasons they get there and still go nowhere: there are more eligible teams than seats.

  • New Mexico Bowl19%
  • LA Bowl18%
  • Arizona Bowl13%
  • Famous Idaho Potato Bowl9.6%
  • Frisco Bowl6.8%
  • Cure Bowl6.6%

Every bowl, and how each one picks →

Recruiting Pipelines

since 2010

Of the 170 high-school programs with a pipeline page here, 7 have sent Nevada a player since 2010 — 22 signees between them. Where they signed, not where they were offered, and not a complete list of Nevada's feeder schools: only these 170 have the outcome history to measure.

High schoolSignedDrafted
CrespiCA40
FolsomCA40
Long Beach PolyCA40
CrenshawCA31
De La SalleCA30
Rancho VerdeCA20
Santa Margarita CatholicCA20
All 170 high-school pipelines →
✓/✗ = whether our pregame model picked the winner. Win % & projections from the Gridpex model. Data: CollegeFootballData.