Skip to content
Cam Akers

#3Cam Akers

RB·Florida State·20191.9 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Cam Akers is a Featured Back for Florida State. Cam's 2019 season ranks in the 13th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 262 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Cam Akers's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2019 Production

Rushing
1144 Rush yards14 Rush TD231 Carries5.0 Yards/carry
Receiving
30 Receptions225 Rec yards4 Rec TD7.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2019 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency13
  • Volume100
  • Explosiveness40
  • Consistency51
  • Receiving52
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)13th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency51th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • Peak game: 0.46 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Syracuse (SP+ -3).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3
Donnel PumphreySan Diego State0.3204.2110.1

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.4600.46Wk 1 vs Boise State: -0.09 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs UL Monroe: +0.29 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Virginia: +0.25 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Louisville: +0.09 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs NC State: +0.05 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Clemson: -0.06 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Wake Forest: +0.16 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Syracuse: +0.46 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Miami: -0.06 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Boston College: -0.08 EPA/play11Wk 14 vs Florida: +0.14 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsBoise StateL31-368.1151167.712120-0.09
2vsUL MonroeW45-44-10.7361935.4255510.29
3@VirginiaL24-316.318784.303910.25
4vsLouisvilleW35-240.2291123.9332100.09
5vsNC StateW31-13-6.317834.9121100.05
7@ClemsonL14-4528.19343.80-0.06
8@Wake ForestL20-222.0301575.2144210.16
9vsSyracuseW35-17-3.0201447.242100.46
10vsMiamiL10-279.622663.003231-0.06
11@Boston CollegeW38-31-5.718593.314490-0.08
14@FloridaL17-4024.0171026.012200.14

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
35.0%
Passing plays
10.1%
Rushing plays
64.2%
Standard downs
40.2%
Passing downs
25.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.16
Passing downs
0.03
Pass / Rush EPA
0.31 / 0.10

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.510−0.14
EPA per play · 2019 · 11 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.