Skip to content
Caden Veltkamp

#10Caden Veltkamp

QB·Western Kentucky·202520247.6 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Caden Veltkamp is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Western Kentucky. Caden's 2024 season ranks in the 38th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 473 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Caden Veltkamp's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Passing
258/389 Comp/Att3108 Pass yards25 Pass TD10 INT66.3% Comp %
Rushing
150 Rush yards7 Rush TD113 Carries1.3 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency38
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat50
  • Consistency68
  • Clutch76
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)38th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency68th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.21 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.07 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Middle Tennessee (SP+ -24).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.0701.07Wk 1 vs Alabama: -0.24 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs Middle Tennessee: +1.07 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Toledo: +0.19 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Boston College: +0.26 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs UTEP: +0.47 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Sam Houston: +0.56 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Kennesaw State: +0.59 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs New Mexico State: +0.47 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.12 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Liberty: +0.26 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Jacksonville State: +0.11 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Jacksonville State: -0.10 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@AlabamaL0-6325.04/9110011.160-0.24
3@Middle TennesseeW49-21-24.427/303985096.3011.07
4vsToledoW26-21-2.520/302421236.62020.19
5@Boston CollegeL20-211.225/392322259.11600.26
7vsUTEPW44-17-22.718/272643172.12910.47
8@Sam HoustonW31-14-6.920/292813083.92710.56
10vsKennesaw StateW31-14-25.117/222763081.62600.59
11@New Mexico StateW41-28-19.018/272462267.62520.47
12vsLouisiana TechL7-12-11.618/261520050.81700.12
13@LibertyL21-380.220/342622366.93000.26
14vsJacksonville StateW19-17-1.028/473011026.4700.11
15@Jacksonville StateL12-52-1.018/30141107.6-410-0.10
20vsJames MadisonL17-277.525/393022076.5-120

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
59.6%
Passing plays
90.4%
Rushing plays
24.9%
Standard downs
55.2%
Passing downs
68.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.28
Passing downs
0.46
Pass / Rush EPA
0.40 / 0.15

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.210−0.492025
EPA per play · 2024 — 2025 · 25 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2024Western Kentucky
7.6
247.1
2025Florida Atlantic
4.0
154.9

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.