Skip to content
Western Kentucky

Western Kentucky Hilltoppers

Conference USA·0-2·
Elo
1327#111
SP+
-13.1#114
FPI
-11.6
AP
NR
Next@ Indiana · Wk 3Win prob 2%Model +31.0
Talent #87 (611.5)Recruiting class #8184% production returning

Roster · 109 players

FR 36SO 16JR 21SR 36
#PlayerPosClHtWt
5Rodney Tisdale Jr.QBSO6'2"195
10Caleb McMickleQBJR6'2"194
11Brock GlennQBJR6'2"225
15Cam O'HaraQBFR6'2"210
3Ajay AllenRBSR5'11"200
9Kalib HicksRBJR5'11"220
22Le'Kamren MeadowsRBFR6'0"215
23Sincere BainesRBSR5'9"195
25Jaden McGillRBSR6'0"210
29Adrion BoydRBJR5'7"185
2K.D. HutchinsonWRSR5'8"185
4Cameron FlowersWRSO5'11"190
7Qua'Vez HumphreysWRSR6'3"225
8Moussa BarryWRSR6'2"195
12Quincy BurroughsWRSR6'1"210
13Jyziah RockwellWRSR6'2"200
17Zion TaylorWRJR6'0"210
18Devin HamiltonWRFR6'4"210
21Nigel JohnsonWRSR6'5"200
24Fonzy SmithWRFR6'1"185
80Jonathan Stafford Jr.WRFR5'9"185
82Tre'Von McgoryWRFR5'11"175
84Jeremiah CarrollWRSR6'0"180
14CC EzirimTESR6'7"250
19Lofton HowardTEJR6'4"235
44Griffin ReimerTESO6'3"245
81Arlando Crafton Jr.TEFR6'4"240
86Eli WiltTEFR6'6"250
87Coleson ArendsTEJR6'4"245
88Aiden MillerTEJR6'3"235
89Cross NimmoTEFR6'5"250
50Alec JohnsonOLSR6'1"295
52Isiah StoudemireOLFR6'3"312
55Roq MontgomeryOLJR6'3"365
56Tyrell ScottOLFR6'3"295
59Alex LopezOLFR6'7"310
64Jackson DiallsOLFR6'4"310
67Tai RayOLJR6'7"330
69Jordan CurllOLFR6'4"280
70Rhett LarsonOLSR6'4"315
72Zach ClaytonOLJR6'5"320
73Nonso OmeziOLSR6'5"340
74Karsten UpchurchOLSR6'5"295
75Brody RiffeOLJR6'8"315
76Max ThurstonOLSO6'5"300
77Jamier SmithOLFR6'3"298
78Tyreek MajorOLSO6'5"325
79Asa HolbertOLFR6'6"290
13Latrevion ThompsonDESR6'3"248
16Darius HamptonDESR6'3"238
17Zsacari MinnisDESO6'3"238
41Brandon ThomasDEFR6'4"224
45Josaiah KnightDESO6'3"238
50Elin JonesDESR6'4"248
55Venson SneedDESR6'4"268
57Isaac TanisDEFR6'2"228
59Sharlandiin StrangeDEFR6'4"244
90Bryce FuldaDEFR6'4"244
94Henry SmithDEFR6'3"254
98Nathan GonzalesDESR6'4"248
0Mackavelli MalotumauDLSR6'1"295
93Rylen Su'a-FiloDLSR6'1"320
33Zeiqui LawtonDTSR6'2"290
51Zayden WaltersDTFR6'3"320
52Jakeem FletcherDTSR6'2"315
53Elijah PeakeDTFR6'1"325
54Sekou PetersDTFR6'2"300
56Kiawan MurphyDTSR6'2"320
91Ceejay EmbryDTFR6'1"280
92Javin GriffinDTSR6'2"320
99Eric EtienneDTSO6'1"305
15Garrison MaddenLBSR6'3"235
18Geajorm AkpalooLBJR6'1"230
20Zach SmithLBSO6'0"224
21Jaylen WesterLBSR6'0"228
22Jordan DonaldLBSO6'2"224
29Joshua MensahLBSR6'1"218
32Westen ArdLBFR6'1"235
34Makhi BrazierLBFR6'1"225
35Elijah RumphLBFR6'0"220
44Kai MicatrottoLBFR5'11"238
2Tony Newsome Jr.DBSR5'11"185
3Christian WhiteDBSR5'11"185
5Dave HerardDBSR6'0"204
6Justin BrownDBJR6'0"195
7Jaylen LewisDBSR5'11"187
8D'Cambren VerrettDBJR6'2"205
10Xavion GriffinDBSO6'0"190
11Canyon MosesDBJR5'10"198
12BJ CareyDBSR6'0"200
14Braxton MyersDBJR6'1"203
19Jacob Cosby-MosleyDBSO5'11"200
23PJ SouffrantDBFR5'10"180
24Lataj WrightDBSR5'10"185
26Leonzay MerziusDBFR5'10"175
27Jordan BergeronDBFR6'1"185
30Taron EssexDBFR6'3"210
31Walter ManningDBSO5'11"185
36Khrystian WashingtonDBJR6'0"182
38Alan GbeeDBJR6'0"195
39Jaylen PollardDBFR5'11"208
33Michael SmithPKSO5'6"172
43Jackson SmithPKSR5'10"215
58Michael BuckPKSO5'10"177
99Karl CampbellPKFR6'5"225
35Daniel WallPFR6'1"190
40Carson PerusseLSJR5'11"213
44Bailey SandersLSSO5'11"223
49Nolan ImhoffLSJR5'11"233

Team Statistics · per game, with national FBS rank

Points / game
17.0
scoring offense
Points allowed
59.5
scoring defense
Differential
-42.5
per game
Offense
Total yards / game
296.0#117
Yards / play
3.8#131
Passing yards / game
159.0#117
Rushing yards / game
137.0#86
First downs / game
20.0#78
3rd down %
37.8%#93
4th down %
66.7%#45
Time of possession
31:50#54
Defense
Yards allowed / game
489.5#128
Yards / play allowed
8.3#135
Pass yards allowed / game
211.0#79
Rush yards allowed / game
278.5#133
3rd down % allowed
54.5%#129
Sacks
0#130
Tackles for loss
5#106
Turnovers & Discipline
Turnover margin
-3#127
Takeaways
3#30
Giveaways
6#133
Penalties / game
6.0#52
Penalty yards / game
49.5#61

Rank is national among all FBS teams (#1 = best), oriented so higher rank = better even for defensive and discipline metrics. Bars show percentile.

Scouting Report · 2026 projection

heavily pass-leaning

Western Kentucky throws it: Tyson Helton's offenses have been heavily pass-leaning across 7 seasons. The strengths are on both sides of the ball, led by 26th at turning trips inside the 40 into points. The way in is 122nd at keeping everything in front of them.

On fourth down he goes for it more often than his peers do from the same spots (+4.0%). Against what the expected-points model recommends he is −18.3% — the profession as a whole is negative on this.

Western Kentucky has played 1 game against an average slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 0% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.

Projected strengths

  • Offenseturning trips inside the 40 into points
    #26
    projected
  • Defensefirst and second down
    #27
    projected
  • Offensestaying on schedule through the air
    #28
    projected

Projected soft spots

  • Defensehitting chunk plays
    #122
    projected

Each bar is where this team sits in the country. Before the season has produced enough football these are PROJECTIONS — last season regressed to the mean, plus talent, returning production, recruiting and whether the staff is the same one — and the season replaces them as it is played. Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.

2026 Season Projection

model win prob · 9 to play
5.35.7
projected final record (now 02)
Exp. wins left
5.3
of 9 games
Bowl odds
45%
reach 6 wins
Best odds
74%
vs Kennesaw State
Toughest
2%
vs Indiana

How the season could finish · 2026 · chance of each final win total · 9 games left

Every remaining game simulated from the model's win probability for it. Tallest bar is the single likeliest finish, not a prediction that it happens.

0123456789
final winstallest bar = 28% chance
Likeliest finish 5-6 (28%)Bowl eligible 45% · marked on the axis at 6

Player Value

EPA contribution by position group + estimated NIL market value (derived from position rates and on-field production — not actual deal figures).

Unit Value — Total EPA
WRQuincy Burroughs, Moussa Barry +3
+7.9 EPA
TELofton Howard, CC Ezirim
+2.9 EPA
QBBrock Glenn, Rodney Tisdale Jr.
+2.4 EPA
RBAjay Allen, Jaden McGill +1
-8.3 EPA

Total EPA produced by each positional group this season. OL value is captured via the rush/pass efficiency of skill players; OL-specific EPA isn't separately reported.

Estimated NIL Market Value
ESTIMATED
RBAjay Allen
~$145K
EPA -3.0-0.100/play30 snaps

Estimated from position-group market rates and on-field EPA contribution. Actual NIL valuations depend on social media following, brand fit, and market negotiations — these figures are directional only.

The Five Factors

ranked vs. FBS · bar = better
Efficiency (PPA)
Off-0.039th#126
Def0.831st#138
Explosiveness
Off1.0415th#117
Def1.784th#132
Field position
Off70.355th#63
Def70.868th#45
Finishing (pts/opp)
Off3.8940th#83
Def6.004th#133
Turnovers
Won 3Lost 6
Margin -3

Opponent-adjusted efficiency

EPA/play vs. schedule
Offense
Defense
Off · pass
0.1118th#113
Off · rush
-0.227th#129

Pass vs. rush (PPA)

Rushing
Off-0.227th#129
Def0.681st#137
Passing
Off0.1118th#114
Def0.903rd#134

Trenches & disruption

Line yards (off)
2.40#117
2nd-level / open-field
0.63 / 0.79
Power / stuff (off)
55.6% / 27.9%
Havoc — total (def)
10.7%#123
Havoc — front 7 / DB
8.3% / 2.5%

Standard vs. passing downs

Pro
Std downs
Off-0.09
Def0.72
Pass downs
Off0.05
Def1.24

PPA on each down type (off vs. def).

Opponent-adjusted by down

Pro
1st2nd3rd
Offense-0.03#99-0.31#1300.19#115
Defense0.61#1380.62#1311.80#138

Elo Trajectory

@NevadaFinal
Elo rating 14381224-214 over season

Team Fingerprint · 2026 · 43 opponent-adjusted metrics · percentile vs 138 FBS teams

Plot these →
worst in FBSbest

Efficiency

  • Offense EPA/play0.0722nd
  • Defense EPA/play allowed0.564th
  • Offense success rate44%46th
  • Defense success rate allowed51%12th

Downs

  • Offense success — standard downs51%50th
  • Offense success — passing downs32%47th
  • Defense success allowed — standard downs51%20th
  • Defense success allowed — passing downs50%7th

Explosiveness

  • Offense explosiveness0.904th
  • Defense explosiveness allowed1.65th
  • Offense explosiveness — standard downs0.8316th
  • Offense explosiveness — passing downs1.17th

Trenches

  • Offense line yards3.045th
  • Defense line yards allowed3.57th
  • Offense highlight yards0.7642nd
  • Defense highlight yards allowed3.14th
  • Offense power success0.6738th
  • Defense power success allowed0.8628th
  • Offense stuff rate0.2032nd
  • Defense stuff rate0.1945th

Third down

  • Third down conversion38%34th
  • Third down distance faced8.312th
  • Third down conversion allowed50%21st
  • Third down distance forced6.736th

Halves

  • Net success rate — first half-0.0332nd
  • Net success rate — second half-0.1119th

Drives

  • Points per drive1.331st
  • Points per drive allowed4.59th
  • Average starting field position2422nd
  • Opponent starting field position3414th
  • Available yards gained40%27th
  • Available yards allowed69%15th
  • Scoring opportunities per drive55%8th
  • Scoring opportunities allowed91%27th
  • Points per scoring opportunity2.342nd
  • Points allowed per opportunity4.910th
  • Three-and-out rate36%27th
  • Three-and-outs forced18%34th

Roster

  • Returning usage78%91st
  • Returning EPA31299th
  • Team talent composite61237th
  • Recruiting class rank81.042nd
  • Recruiting class points18542nd

Every metric is opponent-adjusted and ranked so that higher is always better — a defensive rate that is good when low is ranked accordingly. Sack and tackle-for-loss composition are deliberately absent: their relationship to team quality is a measured null, so they carry a style rather than a rank, and they appear in the pressure signature instead.

Intelligence Report

Offensive DNA

Pass-dominant offense — below average EPA/play nationally
EPA/play
-0.033#126 · bottom 20%
Pass EPA/play
+0.110#114
Rush EPA/play
-0.220#129
Explosiveness
1.045#117
Pts/opportunity
3.89#83
Success rate
36.1%

Pass efficiency edge: 0.330 EPA/play

🛡

Defensive Identity

Coverage-heavy defense — allowing above-average EPA/play
EPA/play allowed
+0.835#138 · bottom 20%
Havoc rate (total)
10.7%#123
Front-7 havoc
8.3%
DB havoc
2.5%
Big play rate allowed
1.785#132
Success rate allowed
60.0%

Disruption comes primarily from the front seven.

📊

Season Signature

17.0 PPG offense, 59.5 allowed — -42.5 margin/game
Points per game
17.0
Points allowed/game
59.5
Scoring margin/game
-42.5
Turnover margin
-3won 3 · lost 6
Production returning
84%
Talent rank (247)
#87

0-2 record through 2 games.

Team Shape · percentile vs. FBS · dashed = 50th

OFFENSE9thEXPLOSIVENESS15thFINISHING40thFIELD POS55thDEFENSE0thHAVOC11th50th100th
Offense
9th
Explosiveness
15th
Finishing
40th
Field Pos
55th
Defense
0th
Havoc
11th

Each axis = national percentile rank. 100th = best in FBS, 0th = worst. Defense and Havoc are oriented so higher = better.

CORE efficiency · situation and opponent removed

Points per 100 plays above average, after the game state is regressed out of every snap and the schedule is solved out across the whole league. The version of this team’s efficiency that can be compared to a team it never played.

Overall
-11.8
#118
Offense
-3.2
#95
Defense
+8.6
#131
Full CORE ratings →

What a possession is worth · 11 drives

MeasureOffenseDefense
Points per drive1.274.46
Starting field positionown 23.8own 33.5
Available yards39.6%68.6%
Scoring opportunities54.5%90.9%
Points per opportunity2.334.90
Three-and-out rate36.4%18.2%
Every team’s drive efficiency →

Play-calling identity

Against what the league calls from the same down, distance, field position, score and clock — so this is the staff, not the game script.

Pass rate
55.4%
Expected, given the spots
52.4%
Over expected
+3.0
Fourth down vs peers
-4
Fourth down vs the model
-67
All play-calling tendencies →

National Landscape · 2026 FBS · offense vs. defense EPA/play

Each dot = one FBS team. Western Kentucky is highlighted. Tap or hover a dot for details.

ELITEDEF. FORTRESSOFF. POWERHOUSEREBUILDING-0.100.00+0.10+0.20+0.30-0.050.00+0.10+0.20Offensive EPA/play← worsebetter →Defensive EPA allowed/play← worsebetter →

Similar Programs

Teams with the closest offense + defense efficiency profile to Western Kentucky in 2026

by EPA/play distance
MarshallSP+ -14.4
Off EPA/play -0.075Def EPA/play +0.644Elo 1389
Match
90%
UL MonroeSP+ -33.2
Off EPA/play -0.154Def EPA/play +0.646Elo 1071
Match
88%
Florida AtlanticSP+ -12.2
Off EPA/play +0.154Def EPA/play +0.644Elo 1189
Match
87%
UABSP+ -16.0
Off EPA/play +0.113Def EPA/play +0.529Elo 1411
Match
82%
OhioSP+ -16.4
Off EPA/play +0.118Def EPA/play +0.493Elo 1318
Match
80%
Arkansas StateSP+ -15.1
Off EPA/play +0.125Def EPA/play +0.491Elo 1353
Match
80%

Similarity = normalized Euclidean distance on season offensive and defensive EPA/play. Teams within ±0.02 EPA/play on both units score >90%.

Program Trajectory · CORE rating · 20152026 · points per game vs an average FBS team

2015: +17.1, #17 of 1282016: +22.7, #10 of 1282017: -9.8, #95 of 1302018: -12.4, #103 of 1302019: +3.3, #48 of 1302020: -9.5, #94 of 1242021: +10.0, #38 of 1302022: +6.6, #40 of 1312023: -4.6, #85 of 1332024: -10.7, #100 of 1342025: -6.3, #83 of 1362026: -11.8, #118 of 138
20152026
Now -11.8 · #118 of 138Best +22.7 in 2016Worst -12.4 in 2018

Program History

recent seasons
YearOverallConfWin %xWLuck
20260-20-0
0%
0.1-0.1
20259-46-2
69%
8.0+1.0
20248-66-3
57%
6.4+1.6
20238-55-3
62%
6.2+1.8
20229-56-2
64%
8.6+0.4
20219-57-2
64%
8.2+0.8
20205-74-3
42%
4.5+0.5
20199-46-2
69%
8.4+0.6
20183-92-6
25%
4.2-1.2
20176-74-4
46%
4.8+1.2

xW = expected wins from per-game dominance. Luck = actual − expected (positive = won close games).

0%of 50,000 simulated 2026 seasons end with them in the field

0-1 so far, projected to finish 5.5-6.7. Wins the Conference USA in 8.5%.

If they finish with…

0%
3 losses
0%
4 losses

Their chance of making it at each final loss count.

down 0.4 points since preseasonlost 14-49 to Nevada against an expected margin of +2, so 37.0 against the number.

  • The Conference USA takes 0.02 bids in an average season.
The full playoff picture →

Conference USA

0-0 in league play, projected 4.4-3.65 of 10 by title odds
8.5%
Wins the Conference USA
20%
Reaches the title game

The Conference USA sends its top two by conference winning percentage, head-to-head breaking a tie. The last berth is level on percentage in 42% of simulated seasons, so a tiebreaker decides it about that often.

  • wk3Western Kentucky at Indiana22.6
  • wk2Western Kentucky at Georgia20.6
  • wk12Western Kentucky at Liberty19.5
  • wk13Kennesaw State at Western Kentucky12.3

Points of title probability riding on each result. The whole Conference USA race →

If not the playoff, then

50%
Bowl eligible
49%
Placed in a bowl
0%
In the playoff
51%
Season over in November

Western Kentucky is 0-1 and needs 6 more wins from 11 games to reach the six that make a team eligible — at most one of which may come against an FCS opponent.

  • Hawai'i Bowl14%
  • New Orleans Bowl12%
  • 68 Ventures Bowl8.7%
  • Armed Forces Bowl6.1%
  • Boca Raton Bowl3.3%
  • Xbox Bowl2.1%

Every bowl, and how each one picks →

Recruiting Pipelines

since 2010

Of the 170 high-school programs with a pipeline page here, 4 have sent Western Kentucky a player since 2010 — 7 signees between them. Where they signed, not where they were offered, and not a complete list of Western Kentucky's feeder schools: only these 170 have the outcome history to measure.

High schoolSignedDrafted
Cedar GroveGA21
Peachtree RidgeGA20
VanguardFL20
East LakeFL11
All 170 high-school pipelines →
✓/✗ = whether our pregame model picked the winner. Win % & projections from the Gridpex model. Data: CollegeFootballData.