#10Braeden Wisloski

WR·James Madison·2025

Braeden Wisloski is a Versatile WR for James Madison. Braeden's 2025 season produced 9.6 total EPA across 40 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.47
Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
Total EPA (value)0.45
Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Braeden Wisloski's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving

26 Receptions358 Rec yards4 Rec TD13.8 Yards/rec

Returns

6 Kick returns98 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

Efficiency100
Volume15
Explosiveness45
Consistency24
Pass-Down0

Player type

Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite

Game-to-game consistency24th %ile · below avg

Key findings

▸Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
▸5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.94 from the first to second half of the season.
▸Peak game: 1.32 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs Texas State (SP+ 2).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

Player	Team	Yr	Plays	WEPA/play	Line val	Total EPA
Tyler Buchner	Notre Dame	2021	51	0.250	0.3	12.8
Samajie Grant	Arizona	2016	62	0.250	0.3	15.5
Justin Lynch	Temple	2021	63	0.240	0.3	15.1
Brandon Chatman	Navy	2025	52	0.230	0.6	12.0
Amare Jones	Tulane	2019	58	0.230	0.8	13.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Rec TD	Long	EPA/play
1	vsWeber State	W45-10	—	1	3	3.0	0	3	-0.14
2	@Louisville	L14-28	12.4	—	—	—	—	—	—
4	@Liberty	W31-13	-9.0	1	1	1.0	0	1	-0.47
5	vsGeorgia Southern	W35-10	-9.4	—	—	—	—	—	-0.94
6	@Georgia State	W14-7	-24.5	—	—	—	—	—	—
7	vsLouisiana	W24-14	-10.1	7	69	9.9	0	31	0.68
8	vsOld Dominion	W63-27	5.9	1	3	3.0	0	3	-0.36
10	@Texas State	W52-20	2.3	1	26	26.0	0	26	1.32
11	@Marshall	W35-23	-4.5	1	26	26.0	1	26	0.45
12	vsApp State	W58-10	-11.4	1	15	15.0	0	15	0.12
13	vsWashington State	W24-20	3.8	1	68	68.0	1	68	1.32
14	@Coastal Carolina	W59-10	-15.1	4	64	16.0	1	39	0.37
15	vsTroy	W31-14	-4.8	2	31	15.5	1	26	0.62
20	@Oregon	L34-51	25.9	6	52	8.7	0	32	—

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

5.3%

Passing plays

13.2%

Rushing plays

0.2%

Standard downs

5.4%

Passing downs

5.0%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.45
Passing downs: -0.20
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.24 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).