Skip to content
Benny Snell Jr.

#26Benny Snell Jr.

RB·Kentucky·201820173.9 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Benny Snell Jr. is a 2-year Featured Back for Kentucky. Benny's 2018 season ranks in the 33th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 286 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Benny Snell Jr.'s projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2018 Production

Rushing
1434 Rush yards16 Rush TD288 Carries5.0 Yards/carry
Receiving
17 Receptions105 Rec yards0 Rec TD6.2 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2018 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency33
  • Volume100
  • Explosiveness40
  • Consistency71
  • Receiving35
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)33th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency71th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • Peak game: 0.58 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Louisville (SP+ -9).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3
Jonathan TaylorWisconsin0.3504.8107.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5800.58Wk 1 vs Central Michigan: +0.47 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Florida: +0.17 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Murray State: +0.18 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Mississippi State: +0.31 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs South Carolina: +0.05 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Texas A&M: -0.01 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Vanderbilt: +0.27 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Missouri: -0.17 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Tennessee: +0.06 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Middle Tennessee: +0.22 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Louisville: +0.58 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Penn State: +0.38 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsCentral MichiganW35-20-20.0201256.321700.47
2@FloridaW27-1623.0271756.502800.17
3vsMurray StateW48-1015755.010.18
4vsMississippi StateW28-723.2251656.640.31
5vsSouth CarolinaW24-1014.928853.0111400.05
6@Texas A&ML14-2021.613604.604180-0.01
8vsVanderbiltW14-77.6321695.310.27
9@MissouriW15-1420.819673.502280-0.17
10vsGeorgiaL17-3432.920733.71150
11@TennesseeL7-245.520814.1062500.06
12vsMiddle TennesseeW34-23-3.8251154.620.22
13@LouisvilleW56-10-9.1181005.620.58
1vsPenn StateW27-2419.0261445.520.38

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
37.3%
Passing plays
7.1%
Rushing plays
56.0%
Standard downs
44.2%
Passing downs
20.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.23
Passing downs
0.10
Pass / Rush EPA
0.17 / 0.21

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.670−0.462018
EPA per play · 2017 — 2018 · 25 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2017Kentucky
3.0
72.2
2018Kentucky
3.9
88.1

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.