Skip to content
Avery Johnson

#2Avery Johnson

QB·Kansas State·20247.7 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Avery Johnson is a Dual-Threat QB for Kansas State. Avery's 2024 season ranks in the 48th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 472 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Avery Johnson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Passing
217/372 Comp/Att2712 Pass yards25 Pass TD10 INT58.3% Comp %
Rushing
605 Rush yards7 Rush TD113 Carries5.4 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

52
Attempts
9.6y
Avg depth
6.2y
After catch
69%
Catch rate

The ball travels 9.6 yards in the air on an average throw 1.1 yards deeper than the median. Another 6.2 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
2
0% · 0y
2
50% · 36y
5
0% · 0y
short
15
80% · 152y
6
83% · 56y
22
82% · 141y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency48
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency81
  • Clutch90
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)48th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency81th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.13 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.94 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs West Virginia (SP+ 2).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9400.94Wk 1 vs UT Martin: +0.17 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Tulane: +0.43 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Arizona: +0.43 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs BYU: +0.12 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Oklahoma State: +0.69 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Colorado: +0.51 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs West Virginia: +0.94 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Kansas: +0.25 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Houston: +0.18 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Arizona State: +0.10 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Cincinnati: +0.42 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Iowa State: +0.35 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsUT MartinW41-614/211532139.53700.17
2@TulaneW34-275.715/231812075.54000.43
3vsArizonaW31-7-2.814/231562075.211000.43
4@BYUL9-3815.315/281300245.17400.12
5vsOklahoma StateW42-20-2.619/312593192.66020.69
7@ColoradoW31-288.115/232242161.9-1510.51
8@West VirginiaW45-182.119/292983096.50.94
9vsKansasW29-274.919/342532066.76710.25
10@HoustonL19-24-8.223/392381247.91800.18
12vsArizona StateL14-249.424/402580254.52110.10
13vsCincinnatiW41-15-0.113/231472077.37210.42
14@Iowa StateL21-2910.312/282203061.56400.35
20vsRutgersW44-416.415/301953171.4571

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
57.7%
Passing plays
97.7%
Rushing plays
23.2%
Standard downs
53.4%
Passing downs
67.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.28
Passing downs
0.53
Pass / Rush EPA
0.34 / 0.50

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.03+0.02
EPA per play · 2024 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.