Skip to content

Utah Tech

In progress. College basketball is still being built and is not in the navigation. The ratings are ours and are shown with the date they were fitted; they are not graded in public.

UAC · 10-20 · AdjEM -8.4, 268 of 362 nationally.

2023-24 seasonthrough ratings as of 2024-04-0824 weekly snapshots

Adjusted ratingas of 2024-04-08

Every team →
AdjEM
-8.4268 of 362
AdjO
98.1285 of 362
AdjD
106.5226 of 362
AdjT
72.163 of 362

Utah Tech went from -2.8 (#205) on 2023-11-05 to -8.4 (#268) on 2024-04-08, peaking at -1.2 (#177) on 2023-11-20.

AdjEM in each weekly snapshot this season; the dashed line is an average D1 team (0).

2023-11-052024-04-08

Four factorsraw season rates · 30 complete games

Leaderboards →
eFG%
50.4%193
TOV%
20.7%357
OREB%
25.8%207
FTA/FGA
40.3%21
Opp eFG%
50.4%174
Opp TOV%
17.1%94
DREB%
70.6%294
Opp FTA/FGA
43.2%344

Résumé10-20 · against the ratings of 2024-04-08

Schedule strength
-0.7161 of 362
Non-conference
-2.0258 of 362
Luck
+0.3%166 of 362
Wins above bubble
-14.4292 of 362
Quad 1
0-3
Quad 2
0-4
Quad 3
3-9
Quad 4
7-4

Quadrants use the selection committee's boundaries (Quad 1 is a home game against the top 30, a neutral one against the top 50, or a road game against the top 75) applied to our ranking, not to the NCAA's NET, so they will not match a NET team sheet game for game. Luck and wins above bubble compare the record with today's ratings; they are not a record of our projections.

Players14 who played · most minutes first

National leaders →
PlayerGMPGPPGRPGAPGeFG%TS%USG%3P%FT%
Noa GonsalvesG3135.512.43.01.556.3%58.6%17.2%38.4%78.3%
Tanner ChristensenC3130.211.56.82.057.6%58.8%19.5%17.6%60.0%
Jaylen SearlesG3028.510.14.91.746.0%48.1%21.9%33.6%60.0%
Beon RileyG2428.510.75.51.853.4%59.0%18.4%40.6%81.3%
Aric DemingsG3022.37.52.12.244.1%48.2%23.0%33.3%65.1%
Hamed OlayinkaF3116.15.33.30.458.9%56.0%18.9%0.0%45.7%
Unisa TurayG2816.54.91.72.639.5%42.2%22.3%31.3%60.5%
Tennessee RainwaterG2511.03.92.00.246.6%52.2%21.7%32.0%68.2%
Caleb StearmanF2510.13.42.40.462.0%65.5%17.0%40.0%72.7%
Angelo KambalaG239.63.00.70.737.7%44.1%21.8%26.2%71.4%
David ElliottG918.79.22.41.756.2%58.3%25.3%42.9%76.9%
Trey HallF164.30.60.70.118.2%20.1%18.5%15.4%33.3%
Stone HutchingsG124.81.60.80.163.6%58.6%14.9%0.0%45.5%
Kade MadsenG41.51.00.30.0100.0%102.6%16.1%—100.0%

Season totals for every game played, from ESPN's statistics feed. In seasons before 2025-26 a roster can be missing a player or hold one who was elsewhere; usage is blank where the players listed do not add up to the team's minutes.

Games10-20

“Ours” is our projected margin for Utah Tech, from the snapshot dated before each game. Games before the season's first snapshot have none.

DateOpponentQuadResultOurs
11-08@Santa ClaraQ2#101L 69-77-10.7
11-11@Jacksonville StateQ3#211W 81-79-0.9
11-17@Youngstown StateQ3#149L 68-75-4.7
11-24@Washington StateQ1#37L 53-93-13.1
11-27@LindenwoodQ4#358W 73-66+6.5
12-02vsUtah ValleyQ3#144W 65-53-2.7
12-06@California BaptistQ3#191W 72-69-5.7
12-09vsIdahoQ4#323L 62-63+15.7
12-11@Cal State NorthridgeQ4#250L 75-80-0.1
12-16vsNorth DakotaQ4#247L 62-79+9.5
12-21@ColoradoQ1#25L 71-98-20.3
12-30vsFlorida InternationalQ4#285W 96-92+5.9
01-04@Seattle UQ2#110L 53-70-12.7
01-06vsGrand CanyonQ2#55L 65-75-8.6
01-11vsStephen F. AustinQ4#169W 75-70-2.4
01-18@Southern UtahQ3#238L 65-75-3.6
01-20@Utah ValleyQ3#144L 71-84-8.6
01-25@Abilene ChristianQ3#229L 60-82-4.0
01-27@Tarleton StateQ3#142L 68-86-7.1
02-01vsUT Rio Grande ValleyQ4#326W 81-64+6.8
02-03vsUT ArlingtonQ3#133L 66-87-0.9
02-08vsSouthern UtahQ4#238W 70-68-0.1
02-10vsCalifornia BaptistQ4#191W 85-78-2.5
02-15@Grand CanyonQ1#55L 61-73-19.1
02-17vsSeattle UQ3#110L 65-66-5.9
02-24@UT ArlingtonQ2#133L 78-89-9.1
02-29vsTarleton StateQ3#142L 74-85-2.9
03-02vsAbilene ChristianQ4#229L 79-86+3.0
03-07@UT Rio Grande ValleyQ4#326W 79-74+1.5
03-09@Stephen F. AustinQ3#169L 71-84-9.3

How this is measured

Ranks are out of 362 rated teams, 1 = best (for AdjD and the defensive factors, 1 = allowed the least). The four factors are raw season rates from box scores.

Every projection uses a rating snapshot dated before the game — the snapshot column shows which. A snapshot dated on or after a game already contains its result, so it is never used to project it; a game before the season's first snapshot gets no number at all. Projected margin is (this team's AdjEM − the opponent's ± home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100.