Skip to content
Zion Turner

#1Zion Turner

Zion Turner is a Volume Passer for Marshall. Zion's 2025 season ranks in the 3th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 61 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Zion Turner's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
40/59 Comp/Att409 Pass yards1 Pass TD1 INT67.8% Comp %
Rushing
135 Rush yards1 Rush TD21 Carries6.4 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency3
  • Volume71
  • Dual-Threat28
  • Consistency27
  • Clutch0
Player type
Volume Passer

High-rep offense that leans on this QB's arm — value comes through cumulative production across a high number of plays.

High play countFranchise-volume role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)3th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency27th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Peak game: 1.07 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Georgia (SP+ 24).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.0701.07Wk 1 vs Georgia: +1.07 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Missouri State: +0.25 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Eastern Kentucky: -0.71 EPA/play3Wk 13 vs App State: +0.19 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Georgia Southern: +0.35 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@GeorgiaL7-4524.16/71000099.71901.07
2vsMissouri StateL20-21-10.713/24830116.66010.25
3vsEastern KentuckyW38-7310-0.71
13@App StateL24-26-11.48/9540044.91600.19
14vsGeorgia SouthernL19-24-9.413/191721044.9900.35

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
24.7%
Passing plays
46.3%
Rushing plays
10.5%
Standard downs
21.4%
Passing downs
31.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.37
Passing downs
0.14
Pass / Rush EPA
0.33 / 0.04

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.